Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;2(4):231-247.
doi: 10.3390/dna2040017. Epub 2022 Oct 11.

Multi-Faceted Roles of ERCC1-XPF Nuclease in Processing Non-B DNA Structures

Affiliations

Multi-Faceted Roles of ERCC1-XPF Nuclease in Processing Non-B DNA Structures

Tonia T Li et al. DNA (Basel). 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Genetic instability can result from increases in DNA damage and/or alterations in DNA repair proteins and can contribute to disease development. Both exogenous and endogenous sources of DNA damage and/or alterations in DNA structure (e.g., non-B DNA) can impact genome stability. Multiple repair mechanisms exist to counteract DNA damage. One key DNA repair protein complex is ERCC1-XPF, a structure-specific endonuclease that participates in a variety of DNA repair processes. ERCC1-XPF is involved in nucleotide excision repair (NER), repair of DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs), and DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair via homologous recombination. In addition, ERCC1-XPF contributes to the processing of various alternative (i.e., non-B) DNA structures. This review will focus on the processing of alternative DNA structures by ERCC1-XPF.

Keywords: DNA repair; ERCC1-XPF; genetic instability; non-B DNA structure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schematic of non-B DNA structures. (A) R-loop, (B) D-loop, (C) hairpin/stem-loop and slipped DNA (formed at inverted repeat sequences), (D) cruciform DNA formed at inverted repeat sequences, (E) Z-DNA (formed at alternating purine-pyrimidine sequences), (F) H-DNA (formed at polypurine and polypyrimidine DNA sequences with mirror symmetry), (G) G-quadruplex (G4) DNA (formed at G≥3NxG≥3NxG≥3NxG≥3 DNA sequences). Adapted from Wang and Vasquez (2014) [12].
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Proposed mechanism for the cleavage of R-loops. ERCC1-XPF and XPG are recruited to R-loops and can cleave the junctions between the R-loop and the duplex DNA. ERCC1-XPF can cleave both the template and non-template strand, ultimately resulting in DSBs. Adapted from Sollier et al. (2014) [31] and Tian and Alt (2000) [30].
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Cleavage of D-loops by Rad10-Rad1. (A) Rad10-Rad1 cleaves the D-loop to create a nicked Holliday junction or a single Holliday junction. (B) Rad10-Rad1 cleaves 3′ overhangs creating a double Holliday junction. (C) Removal of the 3′ flap of newly synthesized DNA. DNA synthesized past the point of homology is removed by Rad10-Rad1. (D) Removal of non-homologous 3′ tails to initiate DNA synthesis. (E) Removal of non-homologous 3′ tail on the non-invading strand. Cleavage by Rad10-Rad1 is represented by scissors. Adapted from Giaccherini and Gaillard (2021) [34], Mazón et al. (2012) [35], and Lyndaker and Alani (2009) [38].
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Cleavage of hairpin and cruciform structures by ERCC1-XPF. (A) ERCC1-XPF cleaves the stem at the 5′ side of hairpins, while XPG cleaves the 3′ side. (B) ERCC1-XPF cleaves cruciform loops. Cleavage of both loops may result in DSBs that can be processed in an error-generating fashion, resulting in genetic instability. Adapted from de Laat et al. (1998) [51], Sijbers et al. (1996) [52], and Lu et al. (2015) [53].
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Mechanism of mutagenic Z-DNA processing. MSH2-MSH3 binds to the junction between B-DNA and Z-DNA. ERCC1-XPF is then recruited to the site where it can cleave within and/or surrounding the Z-DNA structure, creating a DSB, which can be repaired in an error-generating fashion, leading to genetic instability. Adapted from McKinney et al. (2020) [68].
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Replication-dependent and replication-independent cleavage of H-DNA. (A) In replicationin-dependent processing of H-DNA, ERCC1-XPF and XPG are recruited to H-DNA. ERCC1-XPF cleaves the loop between Hoogsteen hydrogen-bonded strands, and XPG cleaves ssDNA near the DNA duplex. (B) In replication-dependent processing of H-DNA, the structure can impede progressing replication complexes. FEN1 can cleave H-DNA to prevent mutations by allowing for continuous replication. However, ERCC1-XPF and XPG may also cleave this structure, which can then be processed in a mutagenic fashion. Adapted from Zhao et al. (2018) [74].
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Cleavage of G-quadruplex (G4) DNA by ERCC1-XPF. G4 structure formation may occur during cellular processes, such as replication, causing fork stalling. ERCC1-XPF may cleave G4 structures to allow replication and/or repair to continue. Adapted from Li et al. (2019) [102].

Similar articles

References

    1. Bartek J DNA damage response, genetic instability and cancer: From mechanistic insights to personalized treatment. Mol. Oncol 2011, 5, 303–307. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bindra RS; Glazer PM Genetic instability and the tumor microenvironment: Towards the concept of microenvironment-induced mutagenesis. Mutat. Res 2005, 569, 75–85. - PubMed
    1. Beckman RA; Loeb LA Genetic instability in cancer: Theory and experiment. Semin. Cancer Biol 2005, 15, 423–435. - PubMed
    1. Breivik J; Gaudernack G Genomic instability, DNA methylation, and natural selection in colorectal carcinogenesis. Semin. Cancer Biol 1999, 9, 245–254. - PubMed
    1. Gregg SQ; Robinson AR; Niedernhofer LJ Physiological consequences of defects in ERCC1-XPF DNA repair endonuclease. DNA Repair 2011, 10, 781–791. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources