Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Aug 5:5:0282.
doi: 10.34133/hds.0282. eCollection 2025.

Self-Supervised Learning to Unveil Brain Dysfunctional Signatures in Brain Disorders: Methods and Applications

Affiliations
Review

Self-Supervised Learning to Unveil Brain Dysfunctional Signatures in Brain Disorders: Methods and Applications

Ying Li et al. Health Data Sci. .

Abstract

Importance: Precisely decoding brain dysfunction from high-dimensional functional recordings is crucial for advancing our understanding of brain dysfunction in brain disorders. Self-supervised learning (SSL) models offer a transformative approach for mapping dependencies in functional neuroimaging data. Leveraging the intrinsic organization of brain signals for comprehensive feature extraction, these models enable the analysis of critical neurofunctional features within a clinically relevant framework, overcoming challenges related to data heterogeneity and the scarcity of labeled data. Highlight: This paper provides a comprehensive overview of SSL techniques applied to functional neuroimaging data, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography, with a specific focus on their applications in various neuropsychiatric disorders. We discuss 3 main categories of SSL methods: contrastive learning, generative learning, and generative-contrastive methods, outlining their basic principles and representative methods. Critically, we highlight the potential of SSL in addressing data scarcity, multimodal integration, and dynamic network modeling for disease detection and prediction. We showcase successful applications of these techniques in understanding and classifying conditions such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and epilepsy, demonstrating their potential in downstream neuropsychological applications. Conclusion: SSL models provide a scalable and effective methodology for individual detection and prediction in brain disorders. Despite current limitations in interpretability and data heterogeneity, the potential of SSL for future clinical applications, particularly in the areas of transdiagnostic psychosis subtyping and decoding task-based brain functional recordings, is substantial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Overview of the typical SSL pipeline for neuroimaging data analysis. The top represents the brain network pipeline, where raw neurological data are systematically processed to extract meaningful representations. The bottom highlights the core self-supervised model, comprising an encoder–decoder architecture. These refined representations are then utilized for downstream tasks, such as disease categorization, detection, and prediction. The model’s bidirectional learning flow ensures robustness and adaptability across diverse neuroimaging datasets.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
The primary learning strategies within SSL models in neuroimage-based medical applications. In contrastive learning, the graph-based approach generates augmented views of brain graphs to maximize view similarity through encoders and decoders, while the spatiotemporal-based approach focuses on leveraging temporal neural signals for similar contrastive objectives. Generative learning includes a mask-based method, which reconstructs randomly masked brain regions to minimize reconstruction loss, and a VAE-based method, where neural imaging data are encoded and reconstructed to learn global patterns. Last, generative-contrastive learning combines generative modeling, such as GANs, with contrastive learning to capture intrinsic brain representations.

Similar articles

References

    1. Khosla M, Jamison K, Ngo GH, Kuceyeski A, Sabuncu MR. Machine learning in resting-state fMRI analysis. Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;64:101–121. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marek S, Tervo-Clemmens B, Calabro FJ, Montez DF, Kay BP, Hatoum AS, Donohue MR, Foran W, Miller RL, Hendrickson TJ, et al. Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals. Nature. 2022;603(7902):654–660. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Finn ES, Poldrack RA, Shine JM. Functional neuroimaging as a catalyst for integrated neuroscience. Nature. 2023;623(7986):263–273. - PubMed
    1. Fedorov A, Geenjaar E, Wu L, Sylvain T, DeRamus TP, Luck M, Misiura M, Mittapalle G, Hjelm RD, Plis SM, et al. Self-supervised multimodal learning for group inferences from MRI data: Discovering disorder-relevant brain regions and multimodal links. NeuroImage. 2024;285: Article 120485. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen D, Yao L, Liu M, Shen Z, Hu Y, Song Z, Wang Q, Zhang L. Self-supervised learning with adaptive graph structure and function representation for cross-dataset brain disorder diagnosis. In: Linguraru MG, et al. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer; 2024.

LinkOut - more resources