Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 22:12:1598505.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1598505. eCollection 2025.

Characteristics and innovative points of clinical trials of radiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC over the past decade

Affiliations

Characteristics and innovative points of clinical trials of radiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC over the past decade

Mengting Li et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Background: This study aims to statistically and qualitatively evaluate the characteristics of immunoradiotherapy (iRT) clinical trials for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov website over the past decade, to help researchers grasp current research trends and design higher-quality iRT clinical trials in the future.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, descriptive study of interventional non-small cell lung cancer iRT clinical trials registered from 2014 to 2024. This study focuses on the combination of different radiotherapy methods with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), minimizing attention to new immunotherapeutic drugs. It emphasizes the exploration of radiotherapy and suitable patient populations. Therefore, the types of ICIs are limited to PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors, and the main innovative points of the included clinical trials were categorized and statistically analyzed.

Results: As of 24 June 2024, 196 clinical trials were available for analysis. Among these trials, more than 76% of clinical trials focused on patients with stage III and higher NSCLC. About 35.2% of the studies were still recruiting, only 14.8% were marked as completed, and 12.8% had failed, with slow enrollment, safety, and funding issues being the main reasons for failure. Phase 2 trials (56.1%) led significantly, with only 11.7% of trials reaching phase 3; hence, 55.6% had a sample size of fewer than 50 participants. Nearly half (45.4%) of the studies were multi-center trials, and 54.6% had data monitoring. Durvalumab was explicitly mentioned in 30.1% of the studies. Most clinical trials (64.3%) focused on innovating radiotherapy dose adjustments, with 104 studies adopting a hypofractionated radiotherapy-based protocol.

Conclusion: The number of iRT clinical trials in the NSCLC field is rapidly increasing. Most patients are in locally advanced stages or higher, with phase 2 trials predominating. Durvalumab is the representative drug, and researchers are particularly interested in optimizing radiotherapy doses, with a tendency to adopt hypofractionated radiotherapy.

Keywords: clinical trials; immune checkpoint inhibitors; immunoradiotherapy; non-small cell lung cancer; radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screening flowchart for iRT clinical trials registered on the ClinicalTrial.gov from 2014 to 2024. By Figdraw.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of innovative points on treatment methods. By Figdraw.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of innovative points for specific populations or lesions. By Figdraw.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Changing trend of innovative points. (A) Proportion of research involved in different innovative points. (B) Changes in the number of studies related to different innovative points from 2014 to 2024. (C) Main categories of innovative points involve changes in the number of studies over time. (D) Subcategory of innovative points involves changes in the number of studies over time.

Similar articles

References

    1. Shang S, Liu J, Verma V, Wu M, Welsh J, Yu J, et al. Combined treatment of non-small cell lung cancer using radiotherapy and immunotherapy: challenges and updates. Cancer Commun (Lond). (2021) 41:1086–99. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12226, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Turgeon GA, Weickhardt A, Azad AA, Solomon B, Siva S. Radiotherapy and immunotherapy: a synergistic effect in cancer care. Med J Aust. (2019) 210:47–53. doi: 10.5694/mja2.12046, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D, Vicente D, Murakami S, Hui R, et al. Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. (2017) 377:1919–29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709937, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Unger JM, Vaidya R, Hershman DL, Minasian LM, Fleury ME. Systematic review and Meta-analysis of the magnitude of structural, clinical, and physician and patient barriers to Cancer clinical trial participation. J Natl Cancer Inst. (2019) 111:245–55. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy221, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mesko S, Ning MS, Lakomy D, Verma V, Chang JY, O’Reilly M, et al. Thoracic radiation oncology clinical trial accrual and reasons for nonenrollment: results of a large, prospective, multiyear analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. (2020) 107:897–908. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.04.036, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources