Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 29:2025:5585609.
doi: 10.1155/ijod/5585609. eCollection 2025.

Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Treatment of Multiple Adjacent Gingival Recession Defects Using Minimally Invasive Coronally Advanced Flap and Modified Coronally Advanced Flap: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations

Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Treatment of Multiple Adjacent Gingival Recession Defects Using Minimally Invasive Coronally Advanced Flap and Modified Coronally Advanced Flap: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial

Vandana Daga et al. Int J Dent. .

Abstract

Background: The split-mouth randomized clinical trial evaluated and compared the clinical efficacy and patient-centered outcomes of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) combined with modified coronally advanced flap (MCAF) and minimally invasive coronally advanced flap (MICAF) techniques for the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recession (GR) Cairo's RT1 and/or RT2. Methods: Eighteen participants with multiple GR defects were treated using MCAF + PRF and MICAF + PRF approaches in a split-mouth design. A qualified periodontist examined the periodontal clinical parameters (recession height [RH] recession width [RW], clinical attachment level [CAL] gain, probing depth [PD], keratinized tissue width [KTW], and gingival thickness [GT]) and aesthetics at baseline and 6 months later. After 7 days, 3 months, and 6 months, patient-centered outcomes relating to pain/discomfort and aesthetics were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS) and a questionnaire. A statistical study was performed on the variations between the original recording and the subsequent months. Results: Both the surgical methods showed statistically significant improvements in all clinical parameters, such as RH, RW, CAL, PD, and KTW (p < 0.001). MICAF + PRF was found to have a similar clinical efficacy to MCAF + PRF for tissue gain; yet between-group differences in GT after 6 months were not statistically significant. Patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) were significantly better in MICAF + PRF with lower VAS pain scores (p < 0.001) and higher ratings of esthetic satisfaction (p < 0.001) at 6 months' follow-up. Trial Registration: Name of the Registry: Clinical Trials Registry - India (CTRI); Registration Number: CTRI/2019/01/016994.

Keywords: gingival recession; minimally invasive surgical procedures; platelet-rich fibrin; randomized controlled trial; surgical flaps.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a-l) Group 1 MICAF + PRF. (a) Preoperative measurement of gingival recession using a periodontal probe. (b) Administration of local anesthesia. (c-d) Incision design to create a minimally invasive coronally advanced flap (MICAF). (e–g) Preparation of a tunnel. (h) Prepared PRF membrane obtained after centrifugation. (i) Stabilization of the PRF over the defect. (j) Suturing of the flap to secure the PRF and achieve tension-free closure. (k) Postoperative periodontal dressing for site protection. (l) Healed surgical site showing improved gingival coverage and integration.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a–i) Group 2 MCAF + PRF. (a) Preoperative measurement of gingival recession using a periodontal probe. (b) Administration of local anesthesia. (c) Flap reflection showcasing root exposure and defect preparation. (d) Tension-free advancement of the flap. (e) Prepared PRF membrane after centrifugation. (f): PRF secured over the defects with flap repositioning. (g) Suturing of the flap to stabilize the graft and PRF in position. (h): Postoperative dressing applied to protect the surgical site. (i) Healed surgical site showing improved gingival coverage and integration.

References

    1. Chambrone L., Chambrone D., Pustiglioni F. E., Chambrone L. A., Lima L. A. Can Subepithelial Connective Tissue Grafts Be Considered the Gold Standard Procedure in the Treatment of Miller Class I and II Recession-Type Defects? Journal of Dentistry . 2008;36(9):659–671. - PubMed
    1. Nunn M. E., Miyamoto T. Coronally Advanced Flaps (CAF) Plus Connective Tissue Graft (CTG) is the Gold Standard for Treatment of Miller Class I and II Gingival Defects. Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice . 2013;13(4):157–159. - PubMed
    1. Cairo F., Nieri M., Pagliaro U. Efficacy of Periodontal Plastic Surgery Procedures in the Treatment of Localized Facial Gingival Recessions: A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Periodontology . 2014;14:S44–S62. - PubMed
    1. Jasser R. A. L., AlKudmani H., Andreana S. Platelet-Rich Fibrin as a New Approach in Treating Gingival Recession: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Dentistry, Oral Disorders & Therapy . 2017;5(2):1–12.
    1. Stefanini M., Jepsen K., de Sanctis M., et al. Patient-Reported Outcomes and Aesthetic Evaluation of Root Coverage Procedures: A 12-Month Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Journal of Clinical Periodontology . 2016;43(12):1132–1141. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources