Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 4;8(4):ooaf083.
doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf083. eCollection 2025 Aug.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening using time-frequency features of self-recorded respiratory sounds

Affiliations

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening using time-frequency features of self-recorded respiratory sounds

Alberto Tena et al. JAMIA Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death worldwide, with up to 70% of cases remaining undiagnosed. This paper proposes a COPD screening tool based on time-frequency representation features of self-recorded respiratory sounds.

Materials and methods: Respiratory sound samples (breath and cough sounds) were extracted from COPD and asymptomatic non-COPD volunteers using a large, scientific-purpose database. We analyzed 39 time-frequency representation features of breath and cough sounds, combined with age, sex, and smoking status, using Autoencoder neural networks and random forest (RF) algorithms. We compared the performance of different breath and cough RF models built to detect COPD: one based exclusively on sound features, one based exclusively on sociodemographic characteristics, and one based on sound features and sociodemographic characteristics.

Results: Models including breathing features outperformed models exclusively based on sociodemographic characteristics. Specifically, the model combining sociodemographic characteristics and breathing features achieved an area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.901, 0.836, 0.871, and 0.761, respectively, in the test set, representing a substantial increase in AUC when compared to the model based exclusively on sociodemographic characteristics (0.901 vs 0.818).

Discussion: Our results suggest that a lightweight collection of the time-frequency representation features of self-recorded beathing sounds could effectively improve the predictive performance of COPD screening or case-finding questionnaires.

Conclusion: COPD screening through self-recorded breathing sounds could be easily integrated as a low-cost first step in case-finding programs, potentially contributing to mitigate COPD underdiagnosis.

Keywords: COPD screening; artificial intelligence; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; computer-aided diagnosis; machine learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Structure of the Autoencoders. The input and output layers are adjusted to the number of features of the breath and cough datasets (n = 39).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
ROC curves of the 3 models in the breath dataset. Predictions were built in the test set. Abbreviation: ROC, receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
ROC curves of the 3 models in the cough dataset. Predictions were built in the test set. Abbreviation: ROC, receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
ROC curves of the 3 models of the breath dataset in a sensitivity analysis excluding all samples from participants reporting to be never smokers. Predictions were built in the test set. Abbreviation: ROC, receiver operating characteristic.

Similar articles

References

    1. Safiri S, Carson-Chahhoud K, Noori M, et al. Burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and its attributable risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. BMJ. 2022;378:e069679. 10.1136/BMJ-2021-069679 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen S, Kuhn M, Prettner K, et al. The global economic burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease for 204 countries and territories in 2020-50: a health-augmented macroeconomic modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2023;11:e1183-e1193. 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00217-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Diab N, Gershon AS, Sin DD, et al. Underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198:1130-1139. 10.1164/RCCM.201804-0621CI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. 2023 GOLD Report. Accessed June 20, 2024. https://goldcopd.org/2023-gold-report-2/
    1. Mangione CM, Barry MJ, Nicholson WK, et al. ; US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: US preventive services task force reaffirmation recommendation statement. JAMA. 2022;327:1806-1811. 10.1001/JAMA.2022.5692 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources