Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopy: What is the evidence?
- PMID: 40767363
- PMCID: PMC12528828
- DOI: 10.1111/vsu.14329
Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopy: What is the evidence?
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive surgery has made tremendous progress in the last two decades thanks to the more sophisticated instrumentation, new entry ports, vessel sealant devices, and ultrasound dissectors. Cameras and monitors are now high-definition or 4 K, increasing the clarity of the image available to the surgeon. Those progresses have made minimally invasive surgery safer. However, the biggest challenge of minimally invasive surgery is the lack of depth perception, which requires the surgeon's brain to recreate a three-dimensional (3D) image using cues in the field. The development of 3D cameras enable surgeons to have a more realistic depth perception. The development of the third generation of 3D cameras, combined with light-polarizing glasses, resolved the problem of dizziness experienced by surgeons during long and complicated procedures.
Aims: To review the evidence from human and veterinary surgery regarding the benefits of 3D visualization during laparoscopy.
Conclusions and implications: The evidence suggests that 3D visualization enhances depth perception, safety, a smoother learning curve, and overall wellness for surgeons. Some controversies persist on the clinical benefit of 3D visualization, even if most of the studies showed statistically significant reduction of operating time, estimated blood loss, operating errors, and shorten hospital stay in human patients.
© 2025 The Author(s). Veterinary Surgery published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Veterinary Surgeons.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Bogdanova R, Boulanger P, Zheng B. Depth perception of surgeons in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Innov. 2016;23:515‐524. - PubMed
-
- Sakata S, Watson MO, Grove PM, Stevenson ARL. The conflicting evidence of three‐dimensional displays in laparoscopy: a review of systems old and new. Ann Surg. 2016;263:234‐239. - PubMed
-
- van Bergen P, Kunert W, Buess GF. The effect of high‐definition imaging on surgical task efficiency in minimally invasive surgery: an experimental comparison between three‐dimensional imaging and direct vision through a stereoscopic TEM rectoscope. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:71‐74. - PubMed
-
- Usta TA, Gundogdu EC. The role of three‐dimensional high‐definition laparoscopic surgery for gynaecology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27:297‐301. - PubMed
-
- Feng X, Morandi A, Boehne M, et al. 3‐dimensional (3D) laparoscopy improves operating time in small spaces without impact on hemodynamics and psychomental stress parameters of the surgeon. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:1231‐1239. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
