Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Nov;36(11):1549-1561.
doi: 10.1007/s10552-025-02039-7. Epub 2025 Aug 6.

Positive predictive value of cervical cancer screening results recommended for colposcopy by human papillomavirus vaccination status at 3 U.S. healthcare systems

Affiliations

Positive predictive value of cervical cancer screening results recommended for colposcopy by human papillomavirus vaccination status at 3 U.S. healthcare systems

Gaia Pocobelli et al. Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: The positive predictive value (PPV) of cervical cancer screening was projected to decrease in the era of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at three U.S. healthcare systems during 2010-2018. Females aged 21-38 years with an abnormal cervical cancer screening test result for which colposcopy was guideline-recommended were included. We estimated age-specific PPVs of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more severe diagnosis (≥ CIN 2) in HPV-vaccinated and unvaccinated females.

Results: The age-specific PPV point estimates were lower in vaccinated versus unvaccinated females in each age group (21-24; 25-29; and 30-38 years), but the difference was statistically significant only among 25-29-year-olds (PPV = 16.4% [95% CI (confidence interval), 14.6-18.4%] and PPV = 19.8% [95% CI 18.5-21.1%], respectively). Among vaccinated 25-29-year-olds, the PPV was lower in those who received their first dose at ≤ 20 versus > 20 years of age (PPV = 12.1% [95% CI 9.5-15.2%] and PPV = 18.8% [95% CI 16.4-21.4%], respectively). Among all age groups combined, the PPV was lower in vaccinated versus unvaccinated females.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that among females with a cervical test result recommended for colposcopy, the PPV for ≥ CIN2 was lower in those vaccinated versus unvaccinated, and was relatively lower in those vaccinated at younger ages. Future studies will have greater ability to estimate the impact of vaccination at the recommended age (9-12 years) on the PPV as more recent birth cohorts, who had greater vaccine uptake, age-in to screening eligibility.

Keywords: Cervical cancer; Cervical squamous intraepithelial neoplasia; Human papillomavirus vaccination; Positive predictive value; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

References

    1. Lin R, Jin H, Fu X (2023) Comparative efficacy of human papillomavirus vaccines: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Expert Rev Vaccines 22:1168–1178 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bosch FX, Lorincz A, Munoz N, Meijer CJ, Shah KV (2002) The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J Clin Pathol 55:244–265 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Markowitz LE, Dunne EF, Saraiya M et al (2007) Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 56:1–24 - PubMed
    1. Fontham ETH, Wolf AMD, Church TR et al (2020) Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 70:321–346 - PubMed
    1. U. S. Preventive Services Task Force, Curry SJ, Krist AH et al (2018) Screening for cervical cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA 320:674–686 - DOI

MeSH terms

Substances