Cancer outcomes in patients eligible for adjuvant cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors but spared adjuvant chemotherapy by Oncotype Dx: A multicenter retrospective GBECAM 0520 study
- PMID: 40768821
- PMCID: PMC12345302
- DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104554
Cancer outcomes in patients eligible for adjuvant cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors but spared adjuvant chemotherapy by Oncotype Dx: A multicenter retrospective GBECAM 0520 study
Abstract
Background: In pivotal CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) adjuvant trials, most patients received chemotherapy (CT). However, the role of CDK4/6i in patients spared CT by a genomic signature remains unclear. We investigated the proportion of patients without genomic CT indication but eligible for adjuvant abemaciclib or ribociclib, and estimated their potential benefit from CDK4/6i.
Methods: This retrospective, real-world study included patients with T1-T3, N0-N1, HR+/HER2- early breast cancer (eBC) who underwent Oncotype DX (ODX) testing (2005-2024) at nine Brazilian institutions. Genomic CT indication followed TAILORx and RxPONDER; CDK4/6i eligibility followed MonarchE and NATALEE. Primary endpoints were 5-year invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and distant disease-free survival (DDFS) among patients eligible for CDK4/6i, without genomic CT indication, treated with endocrine therapy (ET) alone.
Results: Among 922 patients, ODX showed low (<11), intermediate (11-25), and high (>25) genomic risk in 170 (18.4 %), 585 (63.5 %), and 167 (18.1 %), respectively. Overall, 24 (2.6 %) and 120 (13 %) were eligible for abemaciclib and ribociclib, respectively, had no CT indication, and received ET alone. In these patients (median follow-up: 57.8 and 66.4 months), 5-year iDFS and DDFS were 100 %.
Conclusions and relevance: HR+/HER2- eBC patients eligible for CDK4/6i but spared CT by ODX are a minority and have excellent outcomes with ET alone. This highlights the potential benefits of integrating genomic and clinical risk stratification to refine therapeutic decision-making regarding the need for CDK4/6i.
Keywords: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors; Genomic signatures; Hormone receptor positive early breast cancer; Oncotype DX; Real-world data.
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest LO has received honoraria from Fleury, unrelated to this work. LT has received honoraria from Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Zodiac, Lilly, MSD, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, and BeiGene; served on advisory boards for Lilly, Novartis, MSD, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Roche; received educational support from Pfizer, Libbs, United Medical, Lilly, Zodiac, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, AstraZeneca, MSD, and Roche; and institutional research funding from Novartis, all unrelated to this work. JB has received honoraria and/or served on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Exact Sciences, Gilead Sciences, Knight, Libbs, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche; and received travel grants from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, and Gilead, unrelated to this work. DMG has received honoraria from Lilly, Roche, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo/Lilly, Novartis, and Pfizer; served in advisory roles for Teva, Roche/Genentech, Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo/Lilly, and Pfizer; received research funding from Novartis; and travel support from AstraZeneca, Libbs, and Roche, all unrelated to this work. AKS has received speaker honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Roche, and Libbs; served in advisory roles for Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZeneca and Pfizer; and received travel support from Novartis and Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZeneca, unrelated to this work. RCB has received speaker and/or consultancy honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo, Nestlé Health Science, Addium, Gilead, MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca, Aché, Pfizer, Novartis, and Lilly; received financial support for educational activities from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, and Lilly; and institutional research support from Novartis and AstraZeneca, unrelated to this work. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Andre F., Ismaila N., Allison K.H., Barlow W.E., Collyar D.E., Damodaran S., et al. Biomarkers for adjuvant endocrine and chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jun 1;40(16):1816–1837. - PubMed
-
- Rastogi P., O'Shaughnessy J., Martin M., Boyle F., Cortes J., Rugo H.S., et al. Adjuvant abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy for hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–Negative, high-risk early breast cancer: results from a preplanned monarchE overall survival interim analysis, including 5-Year efficacy outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Mar 20;42(9):987–993. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Hortobagyi G.N., Lacko A., Sohn J., Cruz F., Ruiz Borrego M., Manikhas A., et al. A phase III trial of adjuvant ribociclib plus endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer: final invasive disease-free survival results from the NATALEE trial. Ann Oncol. 2025 Feb;36(2):149–157. - PubMed
-
- Cardoso F., Van’T Veer L.J., Bogaerts J., Slaets L., Viale G., Delaloge S., et al. 70-Gene signature as an aid to treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 25;375(8):717–729. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous