Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Aug 7.
doi: 10.1007/s11065-025-09671-9. Online ahead of print.

Go with the (Blood) Flow: A Systematic Review on the Relationship Between Dynamic Functional Connectivity and Information Processing Speed

Olivia C Haller  1 , Cassandra L Rosenberg  1 , Tricia Z King  2   3
Affiliations
Review

Go with the (Blood) Flow: A Systematic Review on the Relationship Between Dynamic Functional Connectivity and Information Processing Speed

Olivia C Haller et al. Neuropsychol Rev. .

Abstract

Dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) methods could shift understandings about brain-behavior relationships. Information processing speed (IPS) may be of particular interest to dFC analyses as dFC is able to capture time-sensitive FC changes. The present systematic review aims to explore the association between IPS and dFC of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) data in healthy individuals. Included papers were published through July 24, 2023. Searches conducted on ProQuest and ScienceDirect used the search terms processing speed AND fMRI AND resting state AND dynamic functional connectivity OR dynamic functional network connectivity. Studies were eligible based on the following inclusion criteria: empirical research, published in English, use of a well-characterized healthy population (n > 30), use of rsfMRI, calculation of dFC, measurement of IPS, and a statistical test between dFC and IPS. Results reveal mixed findings. Five studies report no relationship between dFC and IPS, whereas eight report mixed or positive findings. We noted several trends in findings that may be driving inconsistencies. Over half of the reviewed studies used the Human Connectome Project data. Second, IPS was more likely to be related to dFC if images were acquired using an eyes open procedure with fixation on a crosshair. As all included IPS measures involved a visual component, IPS and dFC measurement might both be capturing information about visuoperceptual connections. Future work that addresses these biases and trends may illuminate the nature of the relationship between dFC and IPS.

Keywords: Dynamic functional connectivity; Dynamic functional network connectivity; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Information processing speed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Agcaoglu, O., Wilson, T. W., Wang, Y. P., Stephen, J., & Calhoun, V. D. (2019). Resting state connectivity differences in eyes open versus eyes closed conditions. Human Brain Mapping, 40(8), 2488–2498. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24539 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Allen, E. A., Damaraju, E., Plis, S. M., Erhardt, E. B., Eichele, T., & Calhoun, V. D. (2014). Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. Cerebral Cortex, 24(3), 663–676. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs352 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson, K. L., Anderson, J. S., Palande, S., Wang, B. (2018). Topological data analysis of functional MRI connectivity in time and space domains. In Connectomics in NeuroImaging: Second International Workshop, CNI 2018, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2018, Granada, Spain, September 20, 2018, Proceedings 2, 11083 (pp. 67–77). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00755-3_8
    1. Botvinik-Nezer, R., Holzmeister, F., Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., Kirchler, M., Iwanir, R., Mumford, J. A., Adcock, R. A., Avesani, P., Baczkowski, B. M., Bajracharya, A., Bakst, L., Ball, S., Barilari, M., Bault, N., Beaton, D., Beitner, J., Benoit, R. G., … Schonberg, T. (2020). Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams. Nature, 582(7810), 84–88. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2314-9
    1. Bowie, C. R., & Harvey, P. D. (2006). Administration and interpretation of the trail making test. Nature Protocols, 1(5), 2277–2281. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.390 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources