Professional and service-user perspectives regarding the future of mental healthcare in Israel
- PMID: 40770813
- PMCID: PMC12330161
- DOI: 10.1186/s13584-025-00710-7
Professional and service-user perspectives regarding the future of mental healthcare in Israel
Abstract
Background: A recent call has been made in Israel to address the needs of citizens inflicted by multiple adversities such world pandemic, internal conflicts, events of mass trauma and ongoing war. Nonetheless, public's and mental health professional's view regarding these needs and their prioritization is not well understood. This study aims to bridge this gap in knowledge, by assessing mental health service users and professionals' views regarding the future of mental health in Israel.
Methods: Two surveys were distributed to mental health professionals and service users. Responders (286 professionals and 522 service users) were asked about their vision for future mental health services and their views regarding the integration of technology and innovation, using a close-ended measure developed by mental health professionals to address local challenges.
Results: The top-rated category among professionals and service users was improving accessibility, with 75% of the service users and 82% of the professionals ranking this item as one of top-three items. Individuals with less experience with the mental healthcare system tended to rank personalized care as second-ranked priority (OR = 0.48, p = 0.04), whereas highly experienced individuals were more likely to rank alternatives to psychiatric hospitalization as third-ranked priority (OR = 2.99, p < 0.001). Professionals ranked the level of innovation in Israel's mental healthcare as 3.37 (SD = 1.82), and service users ranked 3.18 (SD = 2.12) out of 10. Among mental health professionals, lack of resources was rated as the predominant challenge in implementing technology and innovation.
Conclusions: Policy and decision-makers in Israel should consider addressing the issue of mental healthcare accessibility as top priority when planning a mental health reform, as well as routes to improve personalized care and alternative to psychiatric admissions. Steps should be taken to improve innovation and technology as means to improve the quality of mental healthcare in Israel.
Keywords: Attitudes; Innovation challenges; Professionals; Public mental health; Service users.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was conducted in accordance with ethical principles and guidelines and received the approval of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Richmann University (reference number: P_2024080). All participants signed informed consent prior to their participation. Consent for publication: All authors have agreed to the journal’s conditions of publication, including the copyright and license agreement. The article is original and not under consideration elsewhere. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38837220 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36367232 Free PMC article.
-
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294. Online ahead of print. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025. PMID: 40580081
-
Facilitators and Barriers to Person-centred Care in Child and Young People Mental Health Services: A Systematic Review.Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017 Jul;24(4):870-886. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2052. Epub 2016 Dec 2. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017. PMID: 27910173
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
References
-
- Denmark H. The Danish approach to mental health (2nd ed.). 2023. Available from: https://healthcaredenmark.dk/media/hwqj2a14/thedanishapproachtomentalhea...
-
- Nicaise P, Giacco D, Soltmann B, Pfennig A, Miglietta E, Lasalvia A, et al. Healthcare system performance in continuity of care for patients with severe mental illness: A comparison of five European countries. Health Policy. 2020;124(1):25–36. - PubMed
-
- Australian Government Department of Health. Australia’s long term national health plan. 2019. Available from: https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/australias-long-term-na...
-
- Allison S, Bastiampillai T, Looi JCL, Copolov D, Guaiana G, Judd F. Jumping off the bandwagon: does the basaglian de-hospitalised model work outside trieste?? Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2020;54(10):960–1. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous