Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 7;14(1):48.
doi: 10.1186/s13584-025-00710-7.

Professional and service-user perspectives regarding the future of mental healthcare in Israel

Affiliations

Professional and service-user perspectives regarding the future of mental healthcare in Israel

Amit Kramer et al. Isr J Health Policy Res. .

Abstract

Background: A recent call has been made in Israel to address the needs of citizens inflicted by multiple adversities such world pandemic, internal conflicts, events of mass trauma and ongoing war. Nonetheless, public's and mental health professional's view regarding these needs and their prioritization is not well understood. This study aims to bridge this gap in knowledge, by assessing mental health service users and professionals' views regarding the future of mental health in Israel.

Methods: Two surveys were distributed to mental health professionals and service users. Responders (286 professionals and 522 service users) were asked about their vision for future mental health services and their views regarding the integration of technology and innovation, using a close-ended measure developed by mental health professionals to address local challenges.

Results: The top-rated category among professionals and service users was improving accessibility, with 75% of the service users and 82% of the professionals ranking this item as one of top-three items. Individuals with less experience with the mental healthcare system tended to rank personalized care as second-ranked priority (OR = 0.48, p = 0.04), whereas highly experienced individuals were more likely to rank alternatives to psychiatric hospitalization as third-ranked priority (OR = 2.99, p < 0.001). Professionals ranked the level of innovation in Israel's mental healthcare as 3.37 (SD = 1.82), and service users ranked 3.18 (SD = 2.12) out of 10. Among mental health professionals, lack of resources was rated as the predominant challenge in implementing technology and innovation.

Conclusions: Policy and decision-makers in Israel should consider addressing the issue of mental healthcare accessibility as top priority when planning a mental health reform, as well as routes to improve personalized care and alternative to psychiatric admissions. Steps should be taken to improve innovation and technology as means to improve the quality of mental healthcare in Israel.

Keywords: Attitudes; Innovation challenges; Professionals; Public mental health; Service users.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was conducted in accordance with ethical principles and guidelines and received the approval of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Richmann University (reference number: P_2024080). All participants signed informed consent prior to their participation. Consent for publication: All authors have agreed to the journal’s conditions of publication, including the copyright and license agreement. The article is original and not under consideration elsewhere. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Denmark H. The Danish approach to mental health (2nd ed.). 2023. Available from: https://healthcaredenmark.dk/media/hwqj2a14/thedanishapproachtomentalhea...
    1. Jeppesen P, Wolf RT, Nielsen SM, Christensen R, Plessen KJ, Bilenberg N, et al. Effectiveness of transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy compared with management as usual for youth with common mental health problems. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78(3):250. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nicaise P, Giacco D, Soltmann B, Pfennig A, Miglietta E, Lasalvia A, et al. Healthcare system performance in continuity of care for patients with severe mental illness: A comparison of five European countries. Health Policy. 2020;124(1):25–36. - PubMed
    1. Australian Government Department of Health. Australia’s long term national health plan. 2019. Available from: https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/australias-long-term-na...
    1. Allison S, Bastiampillai T, Looi JCL, Copolov D, Guaiana G, Judd F. Jumping off the bandwagon: does the basaglian de-hospitalised model work outside trieste?? Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2020;54(10):960–1. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources