Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 23:13:1605425.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1605425. eCollection 2025.

Context specific challenges of the WHO infection prevention and control core components in the Faranah region: a mixed methods approach

Affiliations

Context specific challenges of the WHO infection prevention and control core components in the Faranah region: a mixed methods approach

Anna Borodova et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Infection prevention and control (IPC) programs have been reported to reduce healthcare associated infections by up to 70%. These rates vary globally, with scare data suggesting that the highest prevalence occurs in the African region exceeding 50% in Guinea. The Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework facilitates the evaluation of WHO guidelines on core components of infection prevention and control programs. Using this framework, selected healthcare facilities in Faranah, Guinea were evaluated ahead of an implementation of a training of trainer's program. Between May 2023 and March 2024, in a mixed method approach, the core components of 25 healthcare facilities were assessed in conjunction with an evaluation of 17 trainer's knowledge and perception on hand hygiene through standardized tools. Findings were further triangulated through a deductive analysis consisting of participant observations and semi structured interviews. The overall median of the Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework score in the region was basic (242.5, IQR 172.5-342.5). Lowest scores were reported for IPC education, whereas IPC guidelines and healthcare associated infection surveillance received high scores. Rural healthcare centers had the lowest score (210.0, IQR 157.5-265.0), confirmed by qualitative assessment indicating a lack of allocated budget in these facilities in addition to generally observed patient and staff overload. Participant observation found that while healthcare associated infection surveillance scored highly and IPC guidelines were displayed on posters; their practical application was rare. This was triangulated with healthcare workers self-reporting hand hygiene compliance of up to 90% whereby demonstrating considerable gaps in knowledge of WHO hand hygiene standards. Our study provides detailed understanding of a resource limited setting and highlights the importance of continuous IPC training together with behavior changes and the improvement of healthcare associated infection surveillance. In settings where a majority reside in rural areas, appointed health centers must be paid special attention to as they may often be underserved. Finally, infrastructural challenges such as the allocation of budget, patient and staff overload need to be addressed in order to improve the health and safety of patients and healthcare workers.

Keywords: Guinea; IPCAF; core component; hand hygiene; healthcare workers; mixed method.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Score by core components (CC).

Similar articles

References

    1. WHO . (2024). Infection prevention and control. Available online at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/infection-prevention-and-control#tab=t.... [Accessed May 22, 2024]
    1. WHO . (2009) WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care. Available online at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241597906 (Accessed May 22, 2024).
    1. WHO . (2024). Global report on infection prevention and control 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240103986. [Accessed February 22, 2024]
    1. Raoofi S, Pashazadeh Kan F, Rafiei S, Hosseinipalangi Z, Noorani Mejareh Z, Khani S, et al. Global prevalence of nosocomial infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. (2023) 18:e0274248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274248, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Diallo MB, Camara A, Oumar DB, Condé M. Prevalence and risk factors of healthcare-associated infections in three national hospitals in the city of Conakry. Int Rev Trop Med. (2022) 24:175–83.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources