Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 23:16:1643722.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1643722. eCollection 2025.

The CARE project - study protocol and pilot results from the Polish population

Anna Julia Krupa  1 , Silvana Galderisi  2 , Armida Mucci  2 , Tomasz Gondek  3 , Aiste Lengvenyte  4   5 , Dominika Dudek  6 , Marcin Siwek  1
Affiliations

The CARE project - study protocol and pilot results from the Polish population

Anna Julia Krupa et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Introduction: Negative symptoms of schizophrenia (SZ) are a critical unmet need of SZ treatment. In the past years, clinical tools were developed and guidance papers for the evaluation and management of negative symptoms of SZ were published. The CARE (Competence and confidence Assessment of early career psychiatrists' (ECPs) ability to evaluate and manage negative symptoms of SZ) project was designed to examine the competence and confidence of ECPs in assessing and treating negative symptoms of SZ.

Objective: To publish the protocol of the CARE project and a pilot analysis of the data obtained from the Polish sample.

Methods: The CARE project is an international cross-sectional 23-item online survey on competence and confidence in assessing and treating negative symptoms of the ECPs from European countries. This work includes the protocol of the CARE project and a pilot analysis of 140 responses from the Polish ECPs population.

Results: The majority of the participants were trainees (67.2%), not engaged in clinical research (69.3%), reported placement in clinics/wards specialized in SZ care (77.1%) and inclusion of theoretical courses (54.3%) in their specialist training curriculum, and participation in extra-curricular training (62.9%) on the negative symptoms. Few ECPs (6.4%) correctly identified the negative symptoms domains, although the majority of them (55%) reported feeling well-trained to administer and interpret at least one tool for the assessment of the negative symptoms. Respectively, 32.8% and 25.9% reported feeling competent in evaluating and managing the negative symptoms. Specialist status and longer experience were linked to higher likelihood of feeling competent in assessment and management of the negative symptoms. The large majority of ECPs (87.1%) agreed that there should be more emphasis on the negative symptoms of SZ in specialist training. Engagement in clinical research was linked to higher likelihood of correctly identifying the domains of negative symptoms.

Conclusion: The results from the Polish ECPs population indicate a very limited knowledge and preparedness to evaluate and manage negative symptoms of SZ. The CARE study will explore the European ECPs' gap in knowledge and skills in the evaluation and management of the negative symptoms of SZ to inform future educational actions.

Keywords: clinical competence; early career psychiatrists; knowledge; negative symptoms; psychiatric trainees; schizophrenia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
General group characteristics.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ECPs knowledge and sense of competence in evaluation and management of the negative symptoms of SZ.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Galderisi S, Mucci A, Buchanan RW, Arango C. Negative symptoms of schizophrenia: new developments and unanswered research questions. Lancet Psychiatry. (2018) 5:664–77. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30050-6, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kirkpatrick B, Fenton WS, Carpenter WT, Marder SR. The NIMH-MATRICS consensus statement on negative symptoms. Schizophr Bull. (2006) 32:214–9. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbj053, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kirkpatrick B, Strauss GP, Nguyen L, Fischer BA, Daniel DG, Cienfuegos A, et al. The brief negative symptom scale: Psychometric properties. Schizophr Bull. (2011) 37:300–5. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbq059, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kring AM, Gur RE, Blanchard JJ, Horan WP, Reise SP. The Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS): Final development and validation. Am J Psychiatry. (2013) 170:165–72. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12010109, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mané A, García-Rizo C, Garcia-Portilla MP, Bergé D, Sugranyes G, Garcia-Alvarez L, et al. Spanish adaptation and validation of the Brief Negative Symptoms Scale. Compr Psychiatry. (2014) 55:1726–9. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.05.024, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources