Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Aug 5;7(3):e00247.
doi: 10.1097/BS9.0000000000000247. eCollection 2025 Sep.

CD7 CAR-T therapy: current developments, improvements, and dilemmas

Affiliations
Review

CD7 CAR-T therapy: current developments, improvements, and dilemmas

Linjuan Wang et al. Blood Sci. .

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is an epoch-making immunotherapy for the treatment of relapsed or refractory (r/r) blood tumors, as demonstrated by its successful implementation in r/r B cell-derived malignancies. However, replicating this success in T-cell leukemia or lymphoma remains challenging. Among the various potential target antigens, CD7 has garnered attention as a promising candidate. CD7 CAR-T therapy is one of the most extensively studied approaches for treating r/r T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-ALL/LBL) and r/r acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Based on the source of T cells, CAR-T products can be categorized as autologous and allogeneic, both of which are being tested in clinical trials, each offering specific advantages. Allogeneic CD7 CAR-T cells outperform autologous cells in terms of reducing manufacturing costs, ensuring consistent quality, and improving affordability and availability. Despite these advantages, challenges like graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), host-versus-graft reaction (HVGR), and fratricide pose significant barriers to the clinical application of allogeneic CD7 CAR-T cells. However, innovative gene-editing techniques, such as CRISPR/Cas9 and base editing, and more promising cell sources, such as natural killer T (NKT) cells and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), are emerging as potential solutions. In this review, we discuss the different categories of CD7 CAR-T products, their application in clinical settings, and directions for refinement.

Keywords: AML; CAR-T; CD7; GVHD; clinical application; fratricide; r/r T-ALL/LBL.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Commonly used techniques to avert fratricide, GVHD and HVGR. (A) CRISPR/Cas9: knock out CD7 to prevent fratricide, TRAC or TRBC1 or TRBC2 to avoid GVHD, B2M, or CIITA to circumvent HVGR. (B) Base editing: edit out CD7 to prevent fratricide, TRAC or TRBC1 or TRBC2 to avoid GVHD, B2M, or CIITA to circumvent HVGR. (C) PEBL: anchor CD7 in ER and/or Golgi apparatus to block CD7 trafficking to the T cell membrane. (D) Ibrutinib and dasatinib: inhibit the key kinases in CAR signaling pathway to block CAR cell activation. (E) CAR-NK cells: eliminate tumor cells with autocrine IL-15 to enhance persistence without causing GVHD. (F) CAR-γδT cells: eradicate tumor cells without causing GVHD. (G) iPSCs: reprogrammed from other cell types to differentiate into a wide range of cells for CAR cell production. (H) UCB cells: provide available HSPCs to manufacture CAR-cell products with advantageous phenotypes. B2M = β2 microglobulin, CAR = chimeric antigen receptor, CIITA = class II transactivator, ER = endoplasmic reticulum, GVHD = graft-versus-host disease, HNH = histidine-asparagine-histidine, HSPC HVGR = host versus graft reaction, IL = interleukin, iPSC = induced pluripotent stem cell, MHC = major histocompatibility complex, NK = natural killer, PAM = protospacer adjacent motif, PEBL = protein expression blocker, TRAC = T-cell receptor α, TRBC UCB = umbilical cord blood, βTCR = β T cell receptor.

Similar articles

References

    1. van Dongen JJ, Quertermous T, Bartram CR, et al. T cell receptor-CD3 complex during early T cell differentiation. Analysis of immature T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias (T-ALL) at DNA, RNA, and cell membrane level. J Immunol 1987;138(4):1260–1269. - PubMed
    1. Campana D, Thompson JS, Amlot P, Brown S, Janossy G. The cytoplasmic expression of CD3 antigens in normal and malignant cells of the T lymphoid lineage. J Immunol 1987;138(2):648–655. - PubMed
    1. Teachey DT, Pui CH. Comparative features and outcomes between paediatric T-cell and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet Oncol 2019;20(3):e142–e154. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marks DI, Paietta EM, Moorman AV, et al. T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults: clinical features, immunophenotype, cytogenetics, and outcome from the large randomized prospective trial (UKALL XII/ECOG 2993). Blood 2009;114(25):5136–5145. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shah B, Mattison RJ, Abboud R, et al. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia, version 2.2024, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2024;22(8):563–576. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources