Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 6;17(8):e89502.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.89502. eCollection 2025 Aug.

Ensuring Quality by a Clinical Audit of the Mode of Birth: The Use of the Robson Classification System

Affiliations

Ensuring Quality by a Clinical Audit of the Mode of Birth: The Use of the Robson Classification System

Paraskevi Giaxi et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background The overuse of cesarean section (CS) leads to risks in maternal and neonatal health. One of the highest rates of CS in Europe is observed in Greece, making it essential to understand the factors contributing to this elevated rate, especially among low-risk groups. The implementation of the Robson classification as a clinical audit tool is a key step in enhancing the quality of obstetric and midwifery care, allowing for the systematic monitoring and evaluation of the mode of delivery. The present study aimed to identify the clinical and demographic predictors of CS in women classified in Robson 1 and 2a categories, based on deliveries conducted in 2019 at a private hospital in Athens, Greece. Methodology A retrospective analysis was conducted employing data from 8,572 deliveries in 2019 at a private hospital in Athens by classifying women based on the Robson classification. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify significant predictors in the two groups. Results For the Robson 1 category, the significant predictors were smoking during pregnancy (odds ratio (OR) = 1.75, p = 0.001), use of in vitro fertilization (IVF) (OR = 2.22, p = 0.002), presence of pre-existing maternal conditions (OR = 1.50, p = 0.014), and fetal-related pregnancy pathology (OR = 3.90, p = 0.013). In addition, maternal age between 20 and 29 years was associated with significantly lower odds of CS compared to those aged 30-39 years (OR = 0.65, p=0.022), while gestational age of 39+0 to 41+6 weeks compared to 37+0 to 38+6 weeks (OR = 0.60, p<0.0001) was also linked to lower risk. For the Robson 2a category, the significant predictors were Greek nationality (OR = 1.91, p < 0.0005), smoking during pregnancy (OR = 1.91, p < 0.0005), IVF conception (OR = 1.51, p = 0.044), and neonatal birth weight ≥4,000 g (OR = 2.95, p < 0.0005). On the contrary, reduced odds were noted for maternal age between 20 and 29 years in comparison to the 30-39-year group (OR = 0.70, p = 0.005). The presence of gestational diabetes (OR = 0.66, p = 0.019) and neonatal birth weight below 3,000 g (OR = 0.73, p = 0.027) were also protective factors. Conclusions The use of the Robson classification as a clinical audit tool facilitates the identification of clinical practice patterns associated with the increased CS rates, contributing to the targeted improvement of perinatal quality of care.

Keywords: birth; cesarean section; clinical audit; greece; pregnancy; quality; robson classification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Human subjects: Informed consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Similar articles

References

    1. Clinical audit in health care: axioms and process of the audit cycle. Parissopoulos S. Nosileftiki. 2007;46:514–522.
    1. Why clinical audit is important in midwifery: experiences from Kenya. Gicheha EW, Richens Y, Kivai RM, Lavender T. Afr J Midwifery Womens Health. 2017;11:62–65.
    1. Caesarean section: the history of a controversial operation. Frampton S. Lancet. 2024;403:2282–2283. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. WHO Recommendations: Non-clinical Interventions to Reduce Unnecessary Caesarean Sections. - PubMed
    1. Audit and feedback using the Robson classification to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review. Boatin AA, Cullinane F, Torloni MR, Betrán AP. BJOG. 2018;125:36–42. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources