Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 7.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006889. Online ahead of print.

Tackling Prevention and Early Diagnosis of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma through a National Barrett's Registry and Scientific Network

Affiliations

Tackling Prevention and Early Diagnosis of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma through a National Barrett's Registry and Scientific Network

Nicola B Raftery et al. Ann Surg. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the progression rate of Barrett's esophagus (BE) to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) using a prospectively maintained national registry, quality-assured endoscopy and expert pathology.

Summary of background data: BE is the sole pathologic precursor of EAC. Targeting prevention and early diagnosis through quality-assured BE programs has a compelling rationale.

Methods: A Barrett's Registry and Bioresource was founded in 2011, and data to November 2024 was prospectively documented in a web-based system (Dendrite, UK). Endoscopy and pathology (of specialized intestinal metaplasia) were strictly quality assured per current guidelines. Expert gastrointestinal pathologists classified non-dysplastic BE (NDBE), indefinite for dysplasia (IND), low-grade dysplasia (LGD), and high-grade dysplasia (HGD). Endoscopic eradication therapies were monitored. Multivariable regression models evaluated risk factors for progression, and Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed for overall progression, and progression excluding the first year following the index biopsy.

Results: 9,436 patients were registered, with a median follow up of 4.4y, and 5,331 had at least one follow-up endoscopy. Overall, 252 cases (4.7%, 95% CI 1.70-2.18) of HGD and 255 cases (4.7%, 95% CI 1.72-2.20) of EAC were diagnosed. Among these, 150 cases (2.8%. 95% CI 1.05-1.44) of HGD and 148 (2.7%, 95% CI 1.05-1.44) of EAC were diagnosed more than one year after the index endoscopy. The overall incidence of HGD/EAC combined was 2.42%(95% CI 2.14-2.73), 6.59%(95% CI 5.14-8.46), and 13.79%(95% CI 11.94-15.93) per year in NDBE, IND and LGD, respectively. Independent risk factors include male gender (HR 0.655,95% CI 0.56-0.896,P<0.004), age (HR 1.027, 95% CI 1.02-1.04,P<0.001) and Barrett's length (HR 1.635,95% CI 1.33-2.01,P<0.001). 604 (6.4%) patients underwent RFA, with a complete eradication of SIM in 80.5% and 10 (1%) patients required resectional surgery. Cancer specific survival in the total cohort was 100%.

Conclusions: A structured high volume Barrett's program, underpinned by quality assurance, provides data that highlights a strategy that provides proof of concept in targeting prevention and early detection, and is anticipated to reduce mortality.

Keywords: Barrett’s Esophagus; esophageal adenocarcinoma; gastrointestinal cancer; registry; surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None

Similar articles

LinkOut - more resources