Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct 1;66(10):1622-1630.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.125.270170.

Lesion Absorbed Dose-Response Relationship in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Undergoing [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 Radiopharmaceutical Therapy

Affiliations

Lesion Absorbed Dose-Response Relationship in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Undergoing [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 Radiopharmaceutical Therapy

Milan Grkovski et al. J Nucl Med. .

Abstract

The relationship between lesion absorbed dose (AD) and response in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer undergoing [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) remains poorly understood. The objective of this work was to investigate the AD-response relationship at both the patient and lesion levels. Methods: Sixty-five patients underwent serial SPECT/CT imaging after receiving 7.31 ± 0.27 GBq of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. Single-time-point (STP) (Hänscheid approximation at 72 h) and multiple-time-point voxelwise dosimetry were performed. Patient response was evaluated by changes in serum prostate-specific antigen level before and after cycle 1 of RPT. The response of individual lesions was evaluated by the change in the SUVmax before, during, and after RPT with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Results: Baseline PET and SPECT lesion SUVmax were strongly correlated (Pearson r, 0.74; n = 1364 lesions). Kidney ADs were relatively low (0.28 ± 0.12 Gy/GBq). No significant decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate was observed 1 y after RPT. On average, STP dosimetry underestimated the AD by 8%. A moderate negative relationship was observed between the mean lesion AD for an individual patient (Spearman ρ, -0.33; n = 63) and lesion (Spearman ρ, -0.30; n = 681) responses. Patients receiving a higher mean AD (>7.5 Gy) had a significantly better prostate-specific antigen response (median, 70% vs. -5%; P < 0.001; unpaired t test) and longer biochemical progression-free survival (median, 4.1 mo vs. 1.6 mo; P = 0.005; unpaired t test) compared with patients whose mean AD was less than 7.5 Gy, respectively. Conclusion: A moderate AD-response relationship was observed in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer undergoing [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RPT. The feasibility of STP dosimetry facilitates its implementation for treatment personalization. Kidney ADs may be reduced with abundant hydration.

Keywords: [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617; [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11; dose–response relationship; metastatic prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) diagram.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Relationships between baseline [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET SUVmax and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 SPECT SUVmax (n = 1364 lesions) (A) and VIP as calculated from baseline PET and voxelwise dose maps (n = 65 patients) (B). Linear fit and identity links displayed in blue and gray, respectively.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Feasibility of STP dosimetry. ADmax (A) and ADmean (B) as calculated with either multiple-time-point (MTP) dosimetry or Hänscheid approximation using 72-h data point (STP72). LoA = limits of agreement.
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
AD–response relationship on patient level. (A) Mean AD over all lesions from individual patient vs. percentage change (%Δ) in PSA after cycle 1 of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RPT (n = 63; posttherapy PSA data not available for 2 patients). (B) Corresponding relationship with metric that incorporates ADmean and PSA doubling time before RPT (n = 58; PSA doubling time not available for 5 patients).
FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5.
Outcomes for patients dichotomized based on mean AD from all lesions (cohort median = 7.5 Gy). (A) Best PSA response; P < 0.001 (unpaired t test). Kaplan–Meier estimator results for bPFS survival (B) and overall survival (C). PFS = progression-free survival.
FIGURE 6.
FIGURE 6.
(A) Lesion ADmax vs. %Δ(PSMA PET SUVmax) between baseline (BL) and early follow-up PET (681 lesions and 37 patients). (B) Tumor control probability vs. lesion ADmax from cycle 1. Tumor control was defined as decrease of ≥50% in PSMA PET SUVmax between BL and early follow-up PET. Odds ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.03; P < 0.001.
FIGURE 7.
FIGURE 7.
PET data from 62-y-old patient with baseline PSA of 102 ng/mL and PSA doubling time of 2.1 mo who underwent [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET 5 d before initiation of RPT. Follow-up [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET scans were performed after cycles 2, 4, and 6. Lesions, sized between 6.1 and 87.7 cm3 (median, 41.1 cm3), had AD of 3.36–15.40 Gy/GBq (median, 8.12 Gy/GBq) in cycle 1. Mean lesion AD was 13.6 Gy, and bPFS was 14.0 mo. (A) Maximum-intensity-projection images for baseline PET, [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 SPECT, and 3 follow-up PET scans, acquired 71, 159, and 246 d after initiation of RPT. (B) SUVmax correlation between baseline [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 SPECT. (C) [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 SUVmax over time for all lesions with baseline SUVmax >100 (remained visible and quantifiable at all time points). These lesions had an ADmax of 33–153 Gy in cycle 1.

References

    1. Sartor O, de Bono J, Chi KN, et al.; VISION Investigators. Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1091–1103. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bakht MK, Beltran H. Biological determinants of PSMA expression, regulation and heterogeneity in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2025;22:26–45. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nientiedt C, Heller M, Endris V, et al. Mutations in BRCA2 and taxane resistance in prostate cancer. Sci Rep. 2017;7:4574. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaur H, Salles DC, Murali S, et al. Genomic and clinicopathologic characterization of ATM-deficient prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:4869–4881. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Teroerde M, Nientiedt C, Duensing A, Hohenfellner M, Stenzinger A, Duensing S. Revisiting the role of p53 in prostate cancer. In: Bott SRJ, Ng KL, eds. Prostate Cancer. Exon Publications; 2021. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources