Assessment of Maximum Extension Reservoir of the Lumbar Spine Using Fulcrum Hyperextension Radiographs in Severe Sagittal Spinal Malalignment: A Guide for Selecting Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Alone Versus Anterior Column Realignment in Lateral Corrective Surgery
- PMID: 40776887
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005222
Assessment of Maximum Extension Reservoir of the Lumbar Spine Using Fulcrum Hyperextension Radiographs in Severe Sagittal Spinal Malalignment: A Guide for Selecting Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Alone Versus Anterior Column Realignment in Lateral Corrective Surgery
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective study.
Objectives: To report on the usefulness of fulcrum hyperextension radiograph to assess the maximum extension reservoir (MER) of lumbar spines in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.
Summary of background data: The maximum degree of lumbar lordosis (LL) by lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) will be affected by the MER, which is determined by combination of severity and flexibility of kyphotic deformities of lumbar spine. Although LLIF and anterior column realignment (ACR) are used to treat severe sagittal spinal malalignments, no clear guidelines exist regarding LLIF alone versus ACR.
Materials and methods: We included patients with severe sagittal malalignment undergoing greater than or equal to five-level fusion including the sacrum for ASD. The patients were divided into two groups according to performance of ACR: LLIF group (LLIF alone) and ACR group. Preoperative LL was compared according to patient's positions; standing, active extension, supine, and fulcrum hyperextension. The offsets between postoperative and preoperative fulcrum hyperextension LL were calculated and compared between the groups.
Results: Altogether, 161 patients were included in the study (mean age: 70.2 y; total levels fused: 7.3). Preoperative LL was significantly greatest in fulcrum hyperextension, followed by supine, active extension, and standing positions (37.2°, 26.5°, 23.8°, and 11.7°, respectively, P<0.001). The offsets between postoperative and preoperative fulcrum LL were significantly different between the LLIF and ACR groups (-0.7° vs. 17.8°, P<0.001). Subgroup analysis using patients with an LL offset >0° revealed that the mean LL offsets were 7.6° and 19.4° in the LLIF and ACR groups, respectively.
Conclusions: Fulcrum hyperextension radiographs best represented the MER. Therefore, it can be used to predict the maximum LL by LLIF alone, which can be estimated as fulcrum hyperextension LL+7.6°. This threshold can guide the selection between LLIF alone and ACR in deformity correction using the lateral approach.
Keywords: adult spinal deformity; anterior column realignment; fulcrum hyperextension radiographs; lateral corrective surgery; lateral lumbar interbody fusion; maximum extension reservoir; severe sagittal spinal malalignment.
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Lateral Anterior Column Release in Short Lumbar Fusion… Is It Worth It?World Neurosurg. 2024 Dec;192:e56-e63. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.08.131. Epub 2024 Sep 14. World Neurosurg. 2024. PMID: 39278544
-
Proximal Lumbar Anterior Column Realignment for Iatrogenic Sagittal Plane Adult Spinal Deformity Correction: A Retrospective Case Series.World Neurosurg. 2025 Jan;193:884-892. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.109. Epub 2024 Nov 20. World Neurosurg. 2025. PMID: 39489337
-
Correction of severe spinopelvic mismatch: decreased blood loss with lateral hyperlordotic interbody grafts as compared with pedicle subtraction osteotomy.Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E15. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17195. Neurosurg Focus. 2017. PMID: 28760028
-
Changes in Segmental and Lumbar Lordosis Following Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clin Spine Surg. 2025 Jul 1;38(6):294-303. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001728. Epub 2024 Nov 22. Clin Spine Surg. 2025. PMID: 39575949
-
Radiographic outcomes and complications of anterior column realignment (ACR): a systematic review.Spine J. 2024 Dec;24(12):2273-2284. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.08.003. Epub 2024 Aug 16. Spine J. 2024. PMID: 39154950
References
-
- Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, et al. Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30:682–688.
-
- Kim HJ, Yang JH, Chang DG, et al. Adult spinal deformity: a comprehensive review of current advances and future directions. Asian Spine J. 2022;16:776–788.
-
- Lee JK, Hyun SJ, Kim KJ. Reciprocal changes in the whole-body following realignment surgery in adult spinal deformity. Asian Spine J. 2022;16:958–967.
-
- Shimokawa T, Miyamoto K, Hioki A, et al. Compensatory pelvic retro-rotation associated with a decreased quality of life in patients with normal sagittal balance. Asian Spine J. 2022;16:241–247.
-
- Park SJ, Lee CS, Park JS, et al. A validation study of four preoperative surgical planning tools for adult spinal deformity surgery in proximal junctional kyphosis and clinical outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2023;93:706–716.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous