Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May 22:4:1419418.
doi: 10.3389/fruro.2024.1419418. eCollection 2024.

Lights and shadows on local recurrence after renal surgery: when, why and how to manage

Affiliations
Review

Lights and shadows on local recurrence after renal surgery: when, why and how to manage

Luca Di Gianfrancesco et al. Front Urol. .

Abstract

Introduction: This review aims to analyze the existing literature on local recurrence (LR) in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal cell carcinoma, identifying relative risk factors, and exploring optimal clinical management strategies.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across bibliographic databases, primarily focusing on LR rates. Secondary outcomes included evaluation of positive surgical margins (PSM), nephrometry scores, pathological stage (T and grading), perioperative outcomes, time-to-LR, overall survival, and cancer-specific survival.

Results: Due to the heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis was performed. LR rates after PN varied in the literature; with PSM emerging as a significant risk factor. Other LR risk factors included pathological stage, nephrometry scores, and histological variants. However, evidence regarding optimal LR management in the absence of precise indications was lacking.

Conclusion: LR represents a significant clinical challenge; requiring multidisciplinary assessment and shared decision-making with patients. Given well-established risk factors, clinicians must tailor management strategies to optimize patient outcomes.

Keywords: local recurrence; partial nephrectomy; positive surgical margin; prognostic factor; renal cell carcinoma; review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow-chart.

Similar articles

References

    1. Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y, Bedke J, Capitanio U, Dabestani S, et al. European association of urology guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2022 update. Eur Urol. (2022) 82:399–410. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kreshover JE, Richstone L, Kavoussi LR. Renal cell recurrence for T1 tumors after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. (2013) 27:1468–70. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0197 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bensalah K, Pantuck AJ, Rioux-Leclercq N, Thuret R, Montorsi F, Karakiewicz PI, et al. Positive surgical margin appears to have negligible impact on survival of renal cell carcinomas treated by nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol. (2010) 57:466–71. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.048 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shah PH, Moreira DM, Okhunov Z, Patel VR, Chopra S, Razmaria AA, et al. Positive surgical margins increase risk of recurrence after partial nephrectomy for high risk renal tumors. J Urol. (2016) 196:327–34. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.075 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim SP, Abouassaly R. Treatment of patients with positive margins after partial nephrectomy. J Urol. (2016) 196:301–2. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.078 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources