Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 24:13:1593935.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1593935. eCollection 2025.

Methamphetamine use and suicide risk: a comprehensive case-control study

Affiliations

Methamphetamine use and suicide risk: a comprehensive case-control study

Ahmed Hamed Aljadani et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Potent stimulants, such as methamphetamine, exert powerful psychological and physiological effects that could affect suicide risks. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether methamphetamine use is independently associated with suicidality after adjusting for potential confounding variables.

Methods: This case-control study investigated the independent role of methamphetamine use in suicidal ideation, suicide planning, and suicide attempts in 800 patients who were substance users receiving treatment from mental health hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Methamphetamine users and non-users comprised the case and control groups, respectively. Urine analyses were performed to verify the participants' self-reported drug use, and the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale, Addiction Severity Index, and Timeline Follow-Back approach were used in the data-gathering process. Multivariate analyses, adjusted for confounding factors, were conducted to assess the relationship between methamphetamine use and suicidality. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to determine the survival probabilities of methamphetamine users and non-users.

Results: The proportion of methamphetamine users with a history of suicidality was significantly higher than that of non-users (30% vs. 20%, respectively; p < 0.001), and a higher proportion of users attempted suicide (18% vs. 7%). The dose-response relationship revealed adjusted odds ratios increasing from 1.8 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3-2.5) in light users (1-2 times monthly) to 3.2 (95% CI: 2.3-4.4) in heavy users (every day), demonstrating that daily methamphetamine use significantly increased suicide risk. Compared with that of non-users, methamphetamine users had a significantly poorer survival rate (hazard ratio = 2.4, p < 0.001). Hanging was the most common method of suicide, followed by self-poisoning.

Conclusion: Methamphetamine use was identified as a strong independent predictor of suicidality. These findings underscore the critical need for comprehensive evaluations in mental health care, as well as tailored interventions and long-term monitoring of users to reduce the suicide risk in this vulnerable population.

Keywords: addiction; methamphetamine; predictor; risk; stimulant; suicidality; suicide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Dose–response relationship between methamphetamine use and suicidality risk. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals for suicidality (composite outcome: suicidal ideation, planning, or attempts) by methamphetamine use frequency. ORs are adjusted for age, sex, other substance use, and psychiatric comorbidities. The Cochran-Armitage trend test indicates a significant dose–response relationship (p < 0.001). Error bars represent 95% CIs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Survival probabilities are depicted for both methamphetamine users (blue) and non-users (orange). Log-rank test: χ2 = 28.6, p < 0.001. Median time-to-event is 36 months for users and 48 months for non-users. Proportional-hazards assumptions were met (Schoenfeld residuals, p = 0.53). Shaded areas represent 95% confidence bands.

Similar articles

References

    1. Miller DR, Bu M, Gopinath A, Martinez LR, Khoshbouei H. Methamphetamine dysregulation of the central nervous system and peripheral immunity. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. (2021) 379:372–85. doi: 10.1124/jpet.121.000767, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chomchai C, Chomchai S. Global patterns of methamphetamine use. Curr Opin Psychiatry. (2015) 28:269–74. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000168, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sweileh WM, Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sawalha AF. Substance use disorders in Arab countries: research activity and bibliometric analysis. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. (2014) 9:33. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-9-33, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shrestha P, Katila N, Lee S, Seo JH, Jeong JH, Yook S. Methamphetamine induced neurotoxic diseases, molecular mechanism, and current treatment strategies. Biomed Pharmacother. (2022) 154:113591. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113591, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Al-Asmari AI. A critical review of workplace drug testing methods for old and new psychoactive substances: gaps, advances, and perspectives. Saudi Pharm J. (2024) 32:102065. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2024.102065, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources