Predicting Walking Capacity Outcomes After Moderate-to-High Intensity Locomotor Training in Chronic Stroke
- PMID: 40778783
- DOI: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000528
Predicting Walking Capacity Outcomes After Moderate-to-High Intensity Locomotor Training in Chronic Stroke
Abstract
Purpose: Moderate-to-high intensity locomotor training (M-HIT) is strongly recommended in stroke rehabilitation, but outcomes are variable. This study aimed to identify baseline clinical characteristics that predict changes in walking capacity following M-HIT in chronic stroke.
Methods: This analysis used data from the HIT-Stroke Trial (N = 55), which involved up to 36 sessions of either moderate- or high-intensity locomotor training. A prespecified model assessed how well baseline motor impairment (Fugl-Meyer lower limb motor scale [FM-LL]), comfortable gait speed (CGS), and balance confidence (Activities-specific balance confidence scale [ABC]) independently explain changes in 6-minute walk distance (∆6MWD), while controlling for the treatment group. Exploratory analysis tested additional baseline covariates using the all-possible regressions procedure. The predictive value of each potential covariate was assessed by its average contribution to the explained variance in ∆6MWD (∆pseudo-R2).
Results: With the prespecified model, 8-week ∆6MWD was significantly associated with baseline FM-LL (β = 5.0 [95% CI: 1.4, 8.6]) and ABC (β = 0.7 [0.0, 1.4]), but not CGS (β = - 44.6 [-104.7, 15.6]). The exploratory analysis revealed that the top 7 covariates with the highest mean ∆pseudo-R2 were FM-LL, pain-limited walking duration, ABC, the use of an assistive device, fatigue, depression, and recent walking exercise history >2 days per week.
Discussion and conclusions: On average, participants with less motor impairment and higher balance confidence exhibit greater walking capacity improvements after M-HIT in chronic stroke. Additional negative predictive factors may include pain-limited walking duration, use of an assistive device, fatigue, depression, and recent walking exercise; however, these exploratory findings need to be confirmed in future studies.
Video abstract: Supplemental Digital Content available at [http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A533].
Keywords: gait; locomotion; outcome; stroke; treatment.
Copyright © 2025 Academy of Neurologic Physical Therapy, APTA.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest. The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for this research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by grant R01HD093694 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Update of
-
Predicting Walking Capacity Outcomes After Moderate to High Intensity Locomotor Training in Chronic Stroke.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Aug 26:2024.08.24.24312537. doi: 10.1101/2024.08.24.24312537. medRxiv. 2024. Update in: J Neurol Phys Ther. 2025 Aug 08. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000528. PMID: 39252934 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
References
-
- Hornby TG, Reisman DS, Ward IG, et al. and the Locomotor CPG Appraisal Team. Clinical practice guideline to improve locomotor function following chronic stroke, incomplete spinal cord injury, and brain injury. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020;44(1):49-100.
-
- American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 9th ed. Philadephia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
-
- Boyne P, Miller A, Kubalak O, Mink C, Reisman DS, Fulk G. Moderate to vigorous intensity locomotor training after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of mean effects and response variability. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2024;48(1):15-26.
-
- Nascimento LR, Boening A, Galli A, Polese JC, Ada L. Treadmill walking improves walking speed and distance in ambulatory people after stroke and is not inferior to overground walking: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2021;67(2):95-104.
-
- Lam JM, Globas C, Cerny J, et al. Predictors of response to treadmill exercise in stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010; 24(6):567-574.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
