A Comparison of LASIK Outcomes for High Versus Low Myopia: Large Data Analysis
- PMID: 40778869
- DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20250611-04
A Comparison of LASIK Outcomes for High Versus Low Myopia: Large Data Analysis
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the visual and refractive outcomes of low versus high myopic correction using laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery.
Methods: Patients who underwent myopic LASIK between January 2013 and December 2023 were included. Eyes were divided into two groups based on preoperative myopia severity: low (0.50 to 3.00 diopters [D]) and high (≥ 6.00 D). Adjustments were made to account for differences in baseline and intraoperative parameters.
Results: In this retrospective study, 12,074 eyes of 6,985 patients were included. Mean spherical equivalent (SEQ) was -6.84 D for high myopia and -2.02 D for low myopia. High myopia was found in 6.7% of patients (n = 813), demonstrating preoperative steeper corneas (maximum keratometry 44.49 vs 44.21 D, P < .001) and worse uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA) (2 vs 0.77 logMAR, P < .001; 0.03 vs 0.02 logMAR, P < .001, respectively). Following LASIK, the high myopia group had worse UDVA (0.04 vs 0.01 logMAR, P < .001) and CDVA (0.03 vs 0.01 logMAR, P < .001), higher cylinder (-0.08 vs -0.05 D, P < .001), and SEQ (-0.12 vs -0.07 D, P = .015). Keratometry measurements were flatter in the high myopia group (average: 38.43 vs 41.83 D, P < .001). After accounting for differences in baseline and intraoperative parameters, all of the above-mentioned parameters remained statistically significant. High myopia was not associated with higher re-treatment rates (P = .27).
Conclusions: Although LASIK surgery yielded satisfactory short-term outcomes in both low and high myopia, high myopia showed slightly less favorable refractive results. However, overall results were clinically acceptable in both groups. Similar re-treatment rates may reflect patient satisfaction or variability in surgeons' thresholds for offering enhancement procedures.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: MRS is a speaker for Alcon Laboratories, Inc, Carl Zeiss Meditec, and STAAR Surgical. The remaining authors have disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.
Similar articles
-
Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting myopia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 15;2(2):CD011080. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011080.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28197998 Free PMC article.
-
Visual Acuity and Quality of Life Results in a Randomized Trial of Topography-Guided LASIK With GIS Software Versus Wavefront-Optimized LASIK.J Refract Surg. 2025 Jul;41(7):e625-e634. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20250509-01. Epub 2025 Jul 1. J Refract Surg. 2025. PMID: 40626438 Clinical Trial.
-
Safety and Effectiveness of Laser in Situ Keratomileusis Using the Teneo 317 Model 2 for Correcting Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism: Results of the U.S. FDA Clinical Trial.J Refract Surg. 2024 Aug;40(8):e544-e553. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20240611-03. Epub 2024 Aug 1. J Refract Surg. 2024. PMID: 39120020 Clinical Trial.
-
TransPRK in the treatment of low to moderate and high myopia: a comparative study of the clinical outcomes.Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 13;15(1):25327. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10445-9. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40653540 Free PMC article.
-
Excimer laser refractive surgery versus phakic intraocular lenses for the correction of moderate to high myopia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 17;2014(6):CD007679. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007679.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 24937100 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources