The Knowledge Gap: A Survey of Pelvic Floor Understanding Amongst Gynaecology Trainees in Ireland
- PMID: 40778982
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-025-06208-9
The Knowledge Gap: A Survey of Pelvic Floor Understanding Amongst Gynaecology Trainees in Ireland
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) significantly impacts women's health, yet its assessment and management remain inconsistently covered in Obstetrics and Gynaecology training. This study evaluates the knowledge and training exposure of Obstetrics and Gynaecology trainees in Ireland regarding PFD, identifying gaps and potential areas for improvement.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey-based study included all non-consultant hospital doctors (NCHDs). An anonymous electronic survey was distributed assessing respondent demographics and their training exposure and knowledge of pelvic floor dysfunction through 25 structured questions. Sub-analyses were conducted to explore associations between participant characteristics and knowledge scores. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and Spearman's correlation were used for data analysis.
Results: Of 113 respondents, 109 (96.5%) participated. The median knowledge score was 14/25 (IQR 0-16), with a mean of 9.32. Years since graduation positively correlated with knowledge scores (Spearman's ρ = 0.66, p = 0.05). Higher scores were associated with participation in higher specialty training (15 vs. 7, p < 0.01), exposure to urogynaecology clinics (15 vs. 12, p < 0.01), and operative urogynaecology (15 vs. 3, p < 0.01). Participants with a specific interest in urogynaecology or general/ambulatory gynaecology achieved higher scores (15 vs. 12, p = 0.04).
Conclusions: Wide variability in knowledge and training exposure in pelvic floor dysfunction was identified amongst trainees. Structured programmes emphasizing urogynaecology could enhance trainee competency, ensuring improved understanding and management of pelvic floor dysfunction.
Keywords: Knowledge; Pelvic floor function; Survey; Training programmes; Urogynaecology.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive license to International Urogynecological Association.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics Approval: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the cork university maternity hospital Research Ethics Committee (ECM 4 (j) 30/07/2024). Conflict of interest: The authors report no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Roch M, Gaudreault N, Cyr M-P, Venne G, Bureau NJ, Morin M. The female pelvic floor fascia anatomy: a systematic search and review. Life. 2021;11:900. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11090900 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Grimes WR, Stratton M. Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. Treasure Island: StatPearls; 2023.
-
- Peinado-Molina RA, Hernández-Martínez A, Martínez-Vázquez S, Rodríguez-Almagro J, Martínez-Galiano JM. Pelvic floor dysfunction: prevalence and associated factors. BMC Public Health. 2023;23:2005. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16901-3 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Peinado Molina RA, Hernández Martínez A, Martínez Vázquez S, Martínez Galiano JM. Influence of pelvic floor disorders on quality of life in women. Front Public Health 2023;11:. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1180907 .
-
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). RCOG calling for action to reduce number of women living with poor pelvic floor health. RCOG News and Press Release. 2023.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
