Open repair versus fetoscopic fetal surgery: Which is the best approach for intrauterine myelomeningocele correction? Systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 40779058
- DOI: 10.1007/s00381-025-06915-0
Open repair versus fetoscopic fetal surgery: Which is the best approach for intrauterine myelomeningocele correction? Systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: The Management of Myelomeningocele Study in 2011 the prenatal approach has become the gold standard for the correction of myelomeningocele. Since then, advancements in minimally invasive techniques, including fetoscopic repair, have aimed to minimize maternal complications while maintaining fetal benefits.This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the maternal and neonatal outcomes of open versus fetoscopic myelomeningocele repair in utero.
Methods: We systematically searched PubMed and LILACS databases for studies published between 2011 and 2024, following PRISMA guidelines. Data on maternal and fetal outcomes were extracted and analyzed. A total of 32 studies were included.
Results: Regarding maternal and fetal complications in open and fetoscopic surgery, the rates were respectively: premature rupture of membranes (0.298 95% CI: 0.202-0.393 vs. 0.522 95% CI: 0.254-0.790), oligohydramnios (0.145 95% CI: 0.086-0.203; vs. 0.488 95% CI: 0.162-0.813), premature placental abruption (0.032 95% CI: 0.015-0.048 vs. 0.042 95% CI: 0.0-0.084), birth weight (2261.330 g 95% CI: 2125.819-2369.84; vs. 2251.531 g 95% CI: 1845.674-2657.389), prematurity < 37 weeks (0.789 95% CI: 0.729-0.849 vs. 0.636 95% CI: 0.208-1.064), neonatal sepsis (0.097 95% CI: 0.030-0.163 vs. 0.251 95% CI: 0.046-0.455), surgical time (133.7 min 95% CI: 92.070-175.394 vs. 220.4 min 95% CI: 194.264-246.607), neonatal surgical wound dehiscence (0.043 95% CI: 0.023-0.064 vs. 0.137 95% CI: 0.052-0.222), hydrocephalus (0.422 95% CI: 0.256-0.588 vs. 0.391 95% CI: 0.272-0.510), reversal of brainstem herniation (0.601 95% CI: 0.385-0.816 vs. 0.581 95% CI: 0.356-0.806), maintenance or improvement in motor function (0.809 95% CI: 0.692- 0.927 vs. 0.856 95% CI: 0.734-0.978). Only neonatal sepsis in the fetoscopic surgery group was not statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: The open approach, traditionally associated with better fetal outcomes, showed better outcomes for maternal complications compared to fetoscopic surgery.
Keywords: Fetal neurosurgery; Fetoscopic; Meta analysis; Myelomeningocele; Open repair; Spina bifida.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Fetal Surgery for Myelomeningocele: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes in Fetoscopic versus Open Repair.Fetal Diagn Ther. 2018;43(3):161-174. doi: 10.1159/000479505. Epub 2017 Sep 15. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2018. PMID: 28910784
-
Procedure-related complications of open vs endoscopic fetal surgery for treatment of spina bifida in an era of intrauterine myelomeningocele repair: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;48(2):151-60. doi: 10.1002/uog.15830. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 26612040
-
Benefits and complications of fetal and postnatal surgery for open spina bifida: systematic review and proportional meta-analysis.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Aug;66(2):135-146. doi: 10.1002/uog.29240. Epub 2025 Jun 10. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025. PMID: 40492626 Free PMC article.
-
Prenatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia for improving outcomes.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 27;2015(11):CD008925. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008925.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26611822 Free PMC article.
-
Gestational age at birth varies by surgical technique in prenatal open spina bifida repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jun;232(6):524-537. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.014. Epub 2025 Feb 19. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025. PMID: 39983885
References
-
- Adzick NS (2010) Fetal myelomeningocele: natural history, pathophysiology, and in-utero intervention. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 15:9–14 - PubMed
-
- Keller BA, Farmer DL (2015) Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele: history, research, clinical trials, and future directions. Minerva Pediatr 67:341–356 - PubMed
-
- Kabagambe SK, Jensen GW, Chen YJ, Vanover MA, Farmer DL (2018) Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes in fetoscopic versus open repair. Fetal Diagn Ther 43(3):161–174. https://doi.org/10.1159/000479505 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kohl T, Tchatcheva K, Merz W et al (2009) Percutaneous fetoscopic patch closure of human spina bifida aperta: advances in fetal surgical techniques may obviate the need for early postnatal neurosurgical intervention. Surg Endosc 23:890–895 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical