Vagal-Sparing Versus Non-Vagal-Sparing Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Complications and Weight Outcomes
- PMID: 40779279
- DOI: 10.1007/s11695-025-08144-5
Vagal-Sparing Versus Non-Vagal-Sparing Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Complications and Weight Outcomes
Abstract
Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has long been established as one of the most efficient therapeutic options for patients with obesity and associated medical conditions. However, the impact of concurrent vagal transection during pouch creation on postoperative outcomes remains underreported.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined patients who underwent RYGB between January 2011 and December 2023, with 1 to 5 years of follow-up. Patients were stratified into two groups: vagal sparing RYGB (VS) and non-vagal sparing RYGB (NVS). Data collected included postoperative complications, intraoperative characteristics, weight trajectories, resolution of obesity-related medical conditions, and mortality. Statistical analysis methods included paired t-tests, multivariate regression, and Cox regression models.
Results: Out of 1521 patients, 374 (24.6%) underwent VS-RYGB and 1147 (75.4%) had NVS-RYGB. Patients were predominantly female (80.8%), with a mean age of 47.6 ± 12.1 years and body mass index (BMI) of 46.0 ± 7.7 kg/m2. NVS had significantly longer operative times (p < 0.001) and a higher lysis of adhesions rate (p < 0.001). Marginal ulcer rate was also significantly higher in NVS compared to VS (p = 0.03). In contrast, the rate of dumping syndrome (p = 0.13) and cholelithiasis (p = 0.65) was not significantly different between groups. While overall weight outcomes were similar, VS reached maximum percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) earlier (p = 0.02). Both groups showed comparable obesity-related condition outcomes.
Conclusion: NVS-RYGB was associated with higher operative time. Additionally, vagal transection was significantly associated with marginal ulcer occurrence. Our findings support the potential advantage of vagal-sparing RYGB.
Keywords: Marginal ulcer; Postoperative complications; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; Vagal nerve; Vagal sparing; Vagotomy.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Informed Consent: For this type of study, formal consent is not required. IRB Approval: This study was deemed exempt by the Institutional Review Board. Competing interests: Omar M. Ghanem is a consultant for Olympus, Intuitive, and Medtronic. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Eisenberg D, Shikora SA, Aarts E, et al. American society for metabolic and bariatric surgery (ASMBS) and international federation for the surgery of obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO): Indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery. Surge Obesity Related Dis. 2022;18:1345–56.
-
- Clapp B, Ponce J, Corbett J, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery 2022 estimate of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States. Surgery Obesity Related Dis [Internet]. 2024;20:425–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2024.01.012 . - DOI
-
- Uhe I, Douissard J, Podetta M, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, or one-anastomosis gastric bypass? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Obesity. 2022;30:614–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.23338 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Perathoner A, Weiss H, Santner W, et al. Vagal nerve dissection during pouch formation in laparoscopic roux-y-gastric bypass for technical simplification: does it matter? Obes Surg. 2009;19:412–7. - PubMed
-
- Jawhar N, Abi Mosleh K, Bartosiak KZ, et al. Comprehensive outcomes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with a near-complete 15-year follow-up. Surgery. 2024;176:586–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.02.035 . - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials