Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 7:314:273-283.
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.06.091. Online ahead of print.

Should We Utilize Regional Anesthesia for Traumatic Rib Fracture Patients? A TQIP-Based Study

Marina Levochkina  1 , Carter Colwell  2 , Taneen Maghsoudi  3 , Katie Bower  3 , Tonja Locklear  4 , Maxine Lee  5 , Michael Saccocci  5 , Hunter Sharp  4 , Joshua Stodghill  3
Affiliations

Should We Utilize Regional Anesthesia for Traumatic Rib Fracture Patients? A TQIP-Based Study

Marina Levochkina et al. J Surg Res. .

Abstract

Introduction: Rib fractures are a common injury in trauma patients and can lead to pneumonia, respiratory failure, and mortality. Multimodal analgesia, alone or with regional anesthetic (epidural or local block), is a mainstay in management. Single-institution studies have evaluated the effectiveness of regional anesthesia with varied results. This study utilized national trauma registry (Trauma Quality Improvement Program [TQIP]) data to evaluate the association between regional anesthesia and mortality, as well as secondary outcomes of hospital complications and ventilator/intensive care unit (ICU)/hospital length of stay (HLOS).

Materials and methods: Utilizing TQIP data from 2021, all patients with isolated chest trauma were identified. Data collected included demographic, medical comorbidities, injury severity, type of injury, hospital complications, ventilator/ICU/HLOS, and in-hospital mortality. Patients were categorized as those receiving regional anesthesia (epidural or peripheral nerve block) or no regional anesthesia. Propensity matching was performed, and outcomes were compared.

Results: After propensity matching, 1295 patients were included in each group. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups. Increased HLOS, ICU admissions, unplanned intubations, and unplanned upgrade to the ICU were associated with regional anesthesia. There were no other significant differences in outcomes between the two groups.

Conclusions: A review of TQIP data did not detect a difference in mortality with regional anesthesia for rib fracture management. Rather, regional anesthesia was associated with increased HLOS, ICU admissions, unplanned intubations, and unplanned upgrade to the ICU. Further study is warranted to assess if subsets of patients might benefit from these procedures.

Keywords: Epidural; Flail chest; Pain management; Regional anesthesia; Rib fracture; TQIP; Trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources