An improved EAE-DETR model for defect detection of server motherboard
- PMID: 40781129
- PMCID: PMC12334653
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-14957-2
An improved EAE-DETR model for defect detection of server motherboard
Abstract
This study addresses the challenges of missed and false detections in server motherboard defect identification, which arise from factors such as small target size, positional rotation deviations, and uneven scale distribution. To tackle these issues, we propose an enhanced detection model, EAE-DETR, which is based on an improved version of RT-DETR. Initially, we developed the CSP-EfficientVIM-CGLU module to enhance feature extraction capabilities while simultaneously reducing the model's parameter count through the implementation of dynamic gated convolution and global context modeling. Subsequently, we introduced the AIFI-ASSA module, designed to mitigate background noise interference and improve sensitivity to minor defects by employing an adaptive sparse self-attention mechanism. Lastly, we constructed the EUCB-SC upsampling module, which integrates depth convolution and channel shuffling strategies to enhance feature reconstruction efficiency. Experimental results on the PCBA-DET dataset indicate that EAE-DETR achieves a mean Average Precision (mAP) of 78.5% at IoU = 0.5 and 32.6% across IoU thresholds of 0.5 to 0.95, surpassing the baseline RT-DETR-R18 by 3.6% and 6.5%, respectively. Furthermore, the model demonstrates a reduction in parameter count by 21.7% and a decrease in computational load by 12.0%. On the PKU-Market-PCB dataset, the mAP50 reached 96.1%, and the mAP50:95 reached 65.1%.This model effectively facilitates high-precision and high-efficiency defect detection for server motherboards in complex industrial environments, thereby offering a robust solution for the intelligent manufacturing sector.
Keywords: Defect detection; Dynamic convolution; Feature fusion; Server motherboard; Sparse attention.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures












Similar articles
-
Enhanced PCB defect detection via HSA-RTDETR on RT-DETR.Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 28;15(1):31783. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11394-z. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40877335 Free PMC article.
-
PHRF-RTDETR: a lightweight weed detection method for upland rice based on RT-DETR.Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jun 24;16:1556275. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1556275. eCollection 2025. Front Plant Sci. 2025. PMID: 40630727 Free PMC article.
-
A dual-domain perception gate-controlled adaptive fusion algorithm for road crack detection.Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21485. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07610-5. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40595250 Free PMC article.
-
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35593186 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39679851 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Liu, Z. & Qu, B. Machine vision based online detection of PCB defect. Microprocess. Microsyst.82, 103807 (2021).
-
- Tang, J. et al. PCB-YOLO: an improved detection algorithm of PCB surface defects based on YOLOv5. Sustainability15(7), 5963 (2023).
-
- Zhou, Y. et al. Review of vision-based defect detection research and its perspectives for printed circuit board. J. Manuf. Syst.70, 557–578 (2023).
-
- Jiang, W. et al. PCB defects target detection combining multi-scale and attention mechanism. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell.123, 106359 (2023).
-
- Chen, M. et al. A comprehensive review of deep learning-based PCB defect detection. IEEE Access.11, 139017–139038 (2023).
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources