Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 8;25(1):1046.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13255-x.

How did health service utilization and delivery change during the COVID-19 pandemic? Frontline healthcare workers' perceptions from the Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Bangladesh

Affiliations

How did health service utilization and delivery change during the COVID-19 pandemic? Frontline healthcare workers' perceptions from the Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Bangladesh

Chiara Altare et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Most countries experienced disruptions in essential health services since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, with the risk and prioritization of COVID-19 leading to diversions of resources and health staff. Disruptions were particularly concerning in humanitarian and fragile settings due to pre-existing vulnerabilities. We investigated how healthcare workers (HCW) perceived changes in health service provision, and whether and how programmatic adaptations were introduced in three humanitarian settings.

Methods: Key informant interviews were conducted with 29, 39 and 54 frontline HCWs in the Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Bangladesh, respectively. The interviews were coded by two authors using deductive and inductive coding. Data were organized in a framework, and thematic analysis was conducted to identify similarities and discrepancies across respondents and study sites. Data were collected between March and July 2021 in each country.

Results: HCWs' perceptions varied across services and countries. Most HCWs reported decreased consultations for maternal and newborn health, sexual reproductive health, communicable diseases, and community-based activities, with mixed perceptions across countries for vaccinations, nutrition, non-communicable diseases, and referrals. Reasons for reduced healthcare utilization included fear of contracting COVID-19 and receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, compliance with movement restrictions, financial barriers, and medication stockouts. Factors specific to humanitarian settings included insecurity, population displacement, presence of a technical partner, lack of medical equipment, and staff shortages. Infection prevention and control measures (i.e., patient triage, mask-wearing, physical distance, hand washing) were introduced in all countries. Other service adaptations included spaced out consultations, reduced group size, extended drug prescriptions, changes in nutrition protocols, telemedicine, and shift to COVID-19 focus during awareness activities.

Conclusions: During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, HCWs reported varying healthcare utilization according to different services and contexts in three humanitarian settings. Program adaptations to address COVID-19 risks were introduced. Although guidance existed at the global level, contextual factors such as insecurity, displacement, and pre-existing capacity affected healthcare utilization and health service delivery more than the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in DRC and CAR, where the number of reported COVID-19 cases remained low for several months.

Keywords: Bangladesh; COVID-19; Central African Republic; Democratic Republic of Congo; Health service delivery; Healthcare workers’ perceptions; Humanitarian settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethical approval was obtained from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health’s Institutional Review Board. This work was determined non-human subject research (determination notice 14719) as qualitative interviews with HCWs were conducted in their professional capacity. National authorizations were obtained from the Ethical Committee of the School of Public Health of the University of Kinshasa (Letter ESP/CE/175/2020), Bangladesh’s Medical Research Council (Ref: BMRC/NREC/2019–2022/125, dated March 4, 2021), and CAR’s Ministry of Health and Population (Letter 065 MSP/DIRCAB/CTC-19/AA/20). Informed consent was obtained by each participant before the interview. No human participant or human tissue was used for this paper. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Consent for publication: Not applicable, as no individual or identifiable information was used in the manuscript. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
COVID-19 Stringency Index by country included in the study [26, 27]

Similar articles

References

    1. Maintaining essential health. Services: operational guidance for the COVID-19 context: interim guidance, 1 June 2020. WHO; 2020.
    1. Ahmed SAKS, Ajisola M, Azeem K, Bakibinga P, Chen Y-F, Choudhury NN, et al. Impact of the societal response to COVID-19 on access to healthcare for non-COVID-19 health issues in slum communities of bangladesh, kenya, Nigeria and pakistan: results of pre-COVID and COVID-19 lockdown stakeholder engagements. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5:e003042. 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003042. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Interim Guidance PUBLIC, HEALTH AND SOCIAL MEASURES FOR, COVID-19. PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE IN LOW CAPACITY AND HUMANITARIAN SETTINGS Endorsed by IASC Principals. 2020.
    1. Lau LS, MRT SG, et al. COVID-19 in humanitarian settings and lessons learned from past epidemics. Nat Med. 2020;26:647–8. - PubMed
    1. Elston JWCCNPWJ. The health impact of the 2014-15 Ebola outbreak. Public Health. 2017;143:60–70. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources