How did health service utilization and delivery change during the COVID-19 pandemic? Frontline healthcare workers' perceptions from the Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Bangladesh
- PMID: 40781305
- PMCID: PMC12335175
- DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-13255-x
How did health service utilization and delivery change during the COVID-19 pandemic? Frontline healthcare workers' perceptions from the Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Bangladesh
Abstract
Background: Most countries experienced disruptions in essential health services since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, with the risk and prioritization of COVID-19 leading to diversions of resources and health staff. Disruptions were particularly concerning in humanitarian and fragile settings due to pre-existing vulnerabilities. We investigated how healthcare workers (HCW) perceived changes in health service provision, and whether and how programmatic adaptations were introduced in three humanitarian settings.
Methods: Key informant interviews were conducted with 29, 39 and 54 frontline HCWs in the Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Bangladesh, respectively. The interviews were coded by two authors using deductive and inductive coding. Data were organized in a framework, and thematic analysis was conducted to identify similarities and discrepancies across respondents and study sites. Data were collected between March and July 2021 in each country.
Results: HCWs' perceptions varied across services and countries. Most HCWs reported decreased consultations for maternal and newborn health, sexual reproductive health, communicable diseases, and community-based activities, with mixed perceptions across countries for vaccinations, nutrition, non-communicable diseases, and referrals. Reasons for reduced healthcare utilization included fear of contracting COVID-19 and receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, compliance with movement restrictions, financial barriers, and medication stockouts. Factors specific to humanitarian settings included insecurity, population displacement, presence of a technical partner, lack of medical equipment, and staff shortages. Infection prevention and control measures (i.e., patient triage, mask-wearing, physical distance, hand washing) were introduced in all countries. Other service adaptations included spaced out consultations, reduced group size, extended drug prescriptions, changes in nutrition protocols, telemedicine, and shift to COVID-19 focus during awareness activities.
Conclusions: During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, HCWs reported varying healthcare utilization according to different services and contexts in three humanitarian settings. Program adaptations to address COVID-19 risks were introduced. Although guidance existed at the global level, contextual factors such as insecurity, displacement, and pre-existing capacity affected healthcare utilization and health service delivery more than the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in DRC and CAR, where the number of reported COVID-19 cases remained low for several months.
Keywords: Bangladesh; COVID-19; Central African Republic; Democratic Republic of Congo; Health service delivery; Healthcare workers’ perceptions; Humanitarian settings.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethical approval was obtained from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health’s Institutional Review Board. This work was determined non-human subject research (determination notice 14719) as qualitative interviews with HCWs were conducted in their professional capacity. National authorizations were obtained from the Ethical Committee of the School of Public Health of the University of Kinshasa (Letter ESP/CE/175/2020), Bangladesh’s Medical Research Council (Ref: BMRC/NREC/2019–2022/125, dated March 4, 2021), and CAR’s Ministry of Health and Population (Letter 065 MSP/DIRCAB/CTC-19/AA/20). Informed consent was obtained by each participant before the interview. No human participant or human tissue was used for this paper. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Consent for publication: Not applicable, as no individual or identifiable information was used in the manuscript. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 30;1(1):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 36715243 Free PMC article.
-
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 2;5:CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.pub2. PMID: 35037252 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 40110911
-
Determinants maintaining healthcare personnel's motivation during COVID-19 pandemic in Uganda.Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 27;15(1):3373. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86685-6. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 39870694 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences regarding post-traumatic stress disorder after 2 years of the last global pandemic.BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):861. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13004-0. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025. PMID: 40598425 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Maintaining essential health. Services: operational guidance for the COVID-19 context: interim guidance, 1 June 2020. WHO; 2020.
-
- Ahmed SAKS, Ajisola M, Azeem K, Bakibinga P, Chen Y-F, Choudhury NN, et al. Impact of the societal response to COVID-19 on access to healthcare for non-COVID-19 health issues in slum communities of bangladesh, kenya, Nigeria and pakistan: results of pre-COVID and COVID-19 lockdown stakeholder engagements. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5:e003042. 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003042. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Interim Guidance PUBLIC, HEALTH AND SOCIAL MEASURES FOR, COVID-19. PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE IN LOW CAPACITY AND HUMANITARIAN SETTINGS Endorsed by IASC Principals. 2020.
-
- Lau LS, MRT SG, et al. COVID-19 in humanitarian settings and lessons learned from past epidemics. Nat Med. 2020;26:647–8. - PubMed
-
- Elston JWCCNPWJ. The health impact of the 2014-15 Ebola outbreak. Public Health. 2017;143:60–70. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- 720FDA20GR00228/United States Agency for International Development
- 720FDA20GR00228/United States Agency for International Development
- 720FDA20GR00228/United States Agency for International Development
- 720FDA20GR00228/United States Agency for International Development
- 720FDA20GR00228/United States Agency for International Development
- 720FDA20GR00228/United States Agency for International Development
- 720FDA20GR00228/United States Agency for International Development
- 720FDA20GR00228/United States Agency for International Development
- 720FDA20GR00228/United States Agency for International Development
- 720FDA20GR00228/United States Agency for International Development
- 720FDA20GR00228/United States Agency for International Development
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical