Disruption and recovery of family planning, contraception and other sexual and reproductive health services in Brazil with COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods approach
- PMID: 40781681
- PMCID: PMC12333048
- DOI: 10.1186/s12978-025-02088-w
Disruption and recovery of family planning, contraception and other sexual and reproductive health services in Brazil with COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods approach
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; Contraception; Family planning; Mixed methods.
Plain language summary
The objectives of this study were to assess the impact of COVID-19 on family planning and contraception and to strengthen policies and services to be more responsive to community needs in Brazil. We used mixed quantitative and qualitative methods to assess SRH service availability and readiness, and clients’ and providers’ perceptions in three COVID-19-affected areas. Interviews were performed at baseline and 6–9 months later. We used five questionnaires for assessing infrastructure availability and readiness to provide SRH services and a qualitative survey to capture health service providers´ perspectives. The qualitative in-depth interviews (IDI) and Focus Group Discussions (FGD) with women and partners were conducted using a semi-structured interview. A thematic content analysis was then performed. The settings had different characteristics influencing the way they faced COVID-19. During the baseline interview, the population mentioned fear of seeking health support in the PHU; however, the same was still observed in one city in the end-line. Antenatal and post-partum care was offered to the population; however, contraception that was considered a priority was not. Contradictory speeches of the government leaders caused discredit to the health measures recommended by the WHO, evidencing the need for alignment among health managers at all levels. The municipal administration plus the coordinators of the health services played a key role in the fight against COVID-19. Contraception was not considered a priority during the pandemic, although participants said they should be essential in future pandemics. The PHU readiness offered antenatal and post-partum care, while other population needs were not prioritized.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Study procedures were approved by the WHO´s RP2 and the Ethics Review Committee (Ref: CERC.0103A on Aug 25th, 2022)) and the Brazilian National Council on Research Ethics (CONEP Approval 4.730.609 on May 24th, 2021). All participants provided consent to participate in the study after either reading or being read to the informed consent document they signed afterward. Consent for publication: Consent to publish de-identified data was obtained from the respondents. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
-
- WHO. WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020. Available from WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19.... Accessed 10 Mar 2024.
-
- WHO. COVID-19 Epidemiological Update. Edition 164. 16th February 2024. Available from https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/covid-19-epidemiological-update-.... Accessed 25 Feb 2024.
-
- Roberton T, Carter ED, Chou VB, Stegmuller AR, Jackson BD, Tam Y, et al. Early estimates of the indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and child mortality in low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(7):e901–8. 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30229-1. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Riley T, Sully E, Ahmed Z, Biddlecom A. Estimates of the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sexual and reproductive health in low- and middle-income countries. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020;46:73–6. 10.1363/46e9020. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources