Patient Needs and Priorities for a Goal-Setting Intervention in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Workshop Report
- PMID: 40782018
- DOI: 10.1111/nep.70106
Patient Needs and Priorities for a Goal-Setting Intervention in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Workshop Report
Abstract
Aim: Kidney transplant recipients have an increased risk of side effects and complications and must adhere to a complex treatment regimen. Goal-setting interventions have the potential for improving behavioural, health and quality of life outcomes. The aim of the workshop was to identify the priorities of kidney transplant recipients regarding goal-setting domains, and to describe their perspectives on the design and implementation of goal-setting interventions.
Methods: We convened an online workshop co-designed with consumers and researchers with three breakout groups involving 18 adult kidney transplant recipients in Australia. Participants identified and voted for goal-setting domains (e.g., diet and nutrition), in order of priority, discussed reasons for their priorities, and provided suggestions for the design and implementation of a goal-setting program. Votes were then scored to reflect the level of priority assigned to each domain. Transcripts from the workshop were analysed thematically.
Results: Of the seven goal-setting domains voted as important to patients, the top five domains were: treatment management (53 points), diet and nutrition (22 points), physical fitness (15 points), social participation (6 points) and mental health (5 points). Four themes that captured the discussions were: adapting to complex self-management responsibilities, strengthening motivation, ensuring safety and contributing to long-term benefits.
Conclusion: In a co-design process, kidney transplant recipients prioritised the goal-setting domains that addressed treatment, lifestyle and psychosocial wellbeing, and suggested that a goal-setting intervention should involve coaching and monitoring.
Keywords: consumer engagement; goal setting; kidney transplantation; qualitative research; quality of life.
© 2025 Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology.
References
-
- G. G. Garcia, P. Harden, and J. Chapman, “The Global Role of Kidney Transplantation,” Lancet 379, no. 9820 (2012): e36–e38.
-
- A. Tong, B. Sautenet, E. D. Poggio, et al., “Establishing a Core Outcome Measure for Graft Health: A Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology‐Kidney Transplantation (SONG‐Tx) Consensus Workshop Report,” Transplantation 102, no. 8 (2018): 1358–1366.
-
- A. Wolfe Robert, B. Ashby Valarie, L. Milford Edgar, et al., “Comparison of Mortality in All Patients on Dialysis, Patients on Dialysis Awaiting Transplantation, and Recipients of a First Cadaveric Transplant,” New England Journal of Medicine 341, no. 23 (1999): 1725–1730.
-
- Y. Bentata, “Tacrolimus: 20 Years of Use in Adult Kidney Transplantation. What We Should Know About Its Nephrotoxicity,” Artificial Organs 44, no. 2 (2020): 140–152.
-
- P. Esposito, F. Furini, T. Rampino, et al., “Assessment of Physical Performance and Quality of Life in Kidney‐Transplanted Patients: A Cross‐Sectional Study,” Clinical Kidney Journal 10, no. 1 (2017): 124–130.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical