Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Aug 9.
doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04711-y. Online ahead of print.

Same-day catheter-free discharge versus overnight observation after artificial urinary sphincter surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Same-day catheter-free discharge versus overnight observation after artificial urinary sphincter surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Bagrat Grigoryan et al. Int Urol Nephrol. .

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes of same-day catheter-free discharge (SDS) and overnight observation (OBS) following artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to April 2025. Studies comparing SDS and OBS in men undergoing AUS surgery were included. Main outcomes were postoperative urinary retention, emergency department (ED) visits within 90 days, and suprapubic catheter (SPC) placement. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using a fixed-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool.

Results: Six studies were included in the systematic review (n = 2424 patients), and four studies (n = 1085) were eligible for meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between SDS and OBS in urinary retention (RR = 1.44, 95% CI 0.81-2.56, p = 0.21) or ED visits within 90 days (RR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.59-1.42, p = 0.69). However, SDS was associated with a significantly reduced risk of SPC placement (RR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.09-0.81, p = 0.02). Risk of bias was moderate to serious in most included studies.

Conclusions: Same-day catheter-free discharge after AUS implantation demonstrated comparable short-term safety outcomes to overnight observation, with a reduced risk of suprapubic catheter placement. Further high-quality prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Keywords: Artificial urinary sphincter; Same-day discharge; Urinary retention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Geraghty K, Keane K, Davis N (2024) Systematic review on urinary continence rates after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Ir J Med Sci 193(3):1603–1612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-023-03603-3 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Linder BJ, Rivera ME, Ziegelmann MJ, Elliott DS (2015) Long-term outcomes following artificial urinary sphincter placement: an analysis of 1082 cases at Mayo Clinic. Urology 86(3):602–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.05.029 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shelton TM, Brimley SC, Nguyen HMT, Voznesensky I, Khalil MI, Machado B, Bhandari NR, Payakachat N, Davis R, Kamel MH, Raheem OA, Benson CR (2021) Changing trends in management following artificial urinary sphincter surgery for male stress urinary incontinence: an analysis of the national surgical quality improvement program database. Urology 147:287–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.07.090 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Najdawi F, Alcantar J, Lee DI, Shahait M, Dobbs RW (2025) Same day discharge after robotic radical prostatectomy. Curr Urol Rep 26(1):27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-025-01254-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Broe M, Carbin Joseph DD, Casson H, Innes M, Adamou C, Fragkoulis G, Moschonas D, Kusuma VRM, Hicks J, Patil K, Perry MJA, Abou Chedid W (2023) Assessment of routine same-day discharge surgery for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 41(10):2679–2684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04566-x - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources