Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 9.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18026-w. Online ahead of print.

Hypothetical Interventions on Frailty Heterogeneous Trajectories of Older Patients with Gastric Cancer Using Parametric G-Formula

Affiliations

Hypothetical Interventions on Frailty Heterogeneous Trajectories of Older Patients with Gastric Cancer Using Parametric G-Formula

Yinning Guo et al. Ann Surg Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Frailty is prevalent in older patients with gastric cancer, seriously affecting their prognosis. The time-varying nature of frailty increases the difficulty of intervention. This study aimed to estimate the effect of hypothetical interventions on the risk of frailty heterogeneous trajectory (FHT) at physical, psychological, familial, and social levels to provide a basis for the subsequent design of intervention programs of FHT.

Patients and methods: The data of hypothetical interventions from a longitudinal follow-up study of older patients with gastric cancer were obtained for 381 patients ≥ 60 years complete at admission, discharge, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The parametric g-formula was used to estimate the risk of single hypothetical interventions on nutrition, anxiety, depression, family cohesion and adaptability, social objective and subjective support, and nursing satisfaction, and its joint interventions in different combinations, for FHT, which were compared with observations to calculate population risk ratios and to determine the optimal combination of interventions.

Results: The observed risk of FHT was 43.57%. Single intervention on nutrition was the most effective factor in reducing the risk of FHT, with a risk ratio (RR) of 0.790 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.692-0.974), followed by family cohesion (RR 0.810, 95% CI 0.741-0.917), social objective support (RR 0.822, 95% CI 0.724-0.931), anxiety (RR 0.864, 95% CI 0.681-0.981), and nursing satisfaction (RR 0.967, 95% CI 0.932-0.995). All joint interventions significantly reduced the risk of FHT. Among them, the "all-factors" joint intervention reduced the risk by 31.26%, with an RR of 0.323 (95% CI 0.208-0.685).

Conclusions: Hypothetical interventions on nutrition, anxiety, family cohesion, social objective support, and nursing satisfaction reduced the risk of FHT in older patients with gastric cancer, both independently and jointly. This suggests that the interventions targeting these factors, as well as any combination of these interventions, may be effective program for improving the FHT in older patients with gastric cancer. It provides theoretical basis and practical guidance for the frailty intervention and is of practical significance for promoting cancer rehabilitation.

Trial registration: The study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05982899). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05982899 .

Keywords: Frailty trajectory; G-formula; Gastric cancer; Heterogeneity; Hypothetical intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure : This study was supported by project “The exploration of trajectories and intervention program of frailty for gastric cancer survivors based on the health ecology theory” supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (no. 82073407), project “Research on the dynamic interaction mechanism and collaborative intervention strategies of multiple frailty subtypes in elderly cancer survivors” supported by NSFC (no.: 72404140), project “Research on the mechanisms and intervention strategies of dietary behaviors of older gastric cancer survivors on frailty development under multi-temporal-situational interactions” supported by Jiangsu Province Postgraduate Scientific Research Innovation Program (KYCX25_2198), and project of “Nursing Scienc” Funded by the 4th Priority Discipline Development Program of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (Jiangsu Education Department (2023, no.11). The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Organization WH. International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2021.
    1. Ding L, Miao X, Lu J, et al. Comparing the performance of different instruments for diagnosing frailty and predicting adverse outcomes among elderly patients with gastric cancer. J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(10):1241–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-021-1701-8 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Dent E, Martin FC, Bergman H, et al. Management of frailty: opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Lancet London Engl. 2019;394(10206):1376–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31785-4 . - DOI
    1. Tanaka T, Suda K, Inaba K, et al. Impact of frailty on postoperative outcomes for laparoscopic gastrectomy in patients older than 80 years. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(12):4016–26. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07640-0 . - DOI - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources