Perceval prosthesis implantation into challenging degenerated aortic valves: a literature review and case series
- PMID: 40783708
- PMCID: PMC12335142
- DOI: 10.1186/s13019-025-03369-y
Perceval prosthesis implantation into challenging degenerated aortic valves: a literature review and case series
Abstract
Background: The Perceval Sutureless prosthesis can increase the effective orifice area (EOA) and reduce the chance of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM). This report presents three patients with challenging degenerated bioprosthetic valves undergoing redo aortic valve replacement (rAVR) using the Perceval (LivaNova, London, UK) prosthesis from a cohort of more than 300 performed cases and a review of the literature on the management of challenging degenerated valves.
Methods: Case 1: Degenerated 23 mm Trifecta with the valve cage densely adherent to the annulus. Cage with sewing ring were excised and annulus sized to a large Perceval valve. Case 2: Degenerated 29 mm Epic from a Bentall's procedure. Calcified and rigid prosthetic leaflets as well as stent posts were excised and XL Perceval implanted. Case 3: Degenerated 27 mm Epic with signs of endocarditis from a history of Bentall's procedure. Three calcified leaflets of the Epic valve were completely excised. The orifice accepted a medium Perceval.
Results: The total Cardiopulmonary Bypass (CPB) and aortic cross clamp (ACC) times (in minutes) were 99.76, 117.68 and 143.99 in Cases 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Moreover, post-implantation transesophageal echocardiogram (TOE) demonstrated a well-seated valve, no paravalvular leak in all cases and a peak gradient of 12.7 mmHg, 14.8 mmHg and 17.7 mmHg in Cases 1, 2 and 3, respectively.
Conclusion: The Perceval prosthesis is an excellent choice for rAVR, as it can safely simplify challenging cases at risk of PPM and is an excellent valve-in-valve alternative to degenerated or infected Bentall valves with patent graft. The Perceval prosthesis can be well seated on the different structures of a degenerated bioprosthetic valve.
Keywords: Aortic valve replacement; Degenerated aortic valve; Perceval.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Jones JM, O’Kane H, Gladstone DJ, Sarsam MA, Campalani G, MacGowan SW, Cleland J, Cran GW. Repeat heart valve surgery: risk factors for operative mortality. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:913–8. - PubMed
-
- Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Gentile F, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the management of patients with Valvular Heart Disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice guidelines. Circulation. 2021;143(5):e35–71. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
