Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70375.
doi: 10.1111/hex.70375.

Navigating Discharge From Early Intervention in Psychosis Services: A Qualitative Exploration of the Experiences of Service Users and Carers

Affiliations

Navigating Discharge From Early Intervention in Psychosis Services: A Qualitative Exploration of the Experiences of Service Users and Carers

Michelle Rickett et al. Health Expect. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Introduction: Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services in England offer up to 3 years' time-limited support to people experiencing early psychosis. Service users (SUs) are discharged to primary care, a community mental health team (CMHT), or other specialist mental health service. The aim of this study is to explore the SU and carer journey through discharge from EIP and into the early post-discharge period.

Methods: Qualitative longitudinal study comprising semi-structured interviews with SUs and carers at, or shortly after, discharge from EIP, and follow-up interviews with SUs 6-11 months later. Data collection conducted between January 2023-September 2024 and informed by information power. Data were thematically analysed by a multidisciplinary team.

Results: SUs and carers expressed their desire to be actively involved in EIP discharge planning and decision-making. They contrasted close relationships with EIP practitioners with inaccessibility of care and difficulties navigating healthcare systems after discharge. Some SUs described feelings of abandonment and expressed a wish for transitional support, and proactive, relationship-based care post-discharge. Carers played an important role as patient advocates but were rarely offered support themselves.

Conclusion: Improved collaboration is needed between SUs, carers and primary care/CMHT practitioners in the build-up to EIP discharge. There should be proactive contact from primary care at the point of discharge and in the early post-discharge period. Carer needs are often overlooked; primary care could utilise the 'carers register' and proactively offer support.

Patient or public contribution: Patient and carer involvement and engagement was key to all stages of this study. The research team met regularly with our two co-investigators with lived experience (as a service user and a carer), who contributed to data analysis and writing this paper. We worked closely with our patient and carer advisory group, EXTEND-ing, throughout the research process. They helped formulate research questions, co-designed topic guides and participant information sheets, and contributed to data analysis and interpretation.

Keywords: discharge planning; early intervention; primary care; psychosis; qualitative methods; severe mental illness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Marshall M., Lewis S., Lockwood A., Drake R., Jones P., and Croudace T., “Association Between Duration of Untreated Psychosis and Outcome in Cohorts of First‐Episode Patients: A Systematic Review,” Archives of General Psychiatry 62, no. 9 (2005): 975–983. - PubMed
    1. Correll C. U., Galling B., Pawar A., et al., “Comparison of Early Intervention Services vs Treatment as Usual for Early‐Phase Psychosis: A Systematic Review, Meta‐Analysis, and Meta‐Regression,” JAMA Psychiatry 75, no. 6 (2018): 555–565. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Puntis S., Minichino A., De Crescenzo F., et al., “Specialised Early Intervention Teams for Recent‐Onset Psychosis,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 11, no. 11 (2020): CD013288, 10.1002/14651858.CD013288.pub2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barr K., Ormrod J., and Dudley R., “An Exploration of What Service Users Value About Early Intervention in Psychosis Services,” Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice 88 (2015): 468–480, 10.1111/papt.12051. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams R., Morris A., Gupta V., et al., “Predictors of Positive Patient‐Reported Outcomes From ‘Early Intervention in Psychosis’: A National Cross‐Sectional Study,” BMJ Mental Health 26 (2023): e300716. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources