Collagen/Hydroxyapatite Hydrogels Promote Intercellular Interactions and Osteogenic Differentiation
- PMID: 40785256
- DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.35632
Collagen/Hydroxyapatite Hydrogels Promote Intercellular Interactions and Osteogenic Differentiation
Abstract
Bone defects resulting from trauma, disease, or congenital abnormalities present formidable clinical challenges, necessitating advanced regenerative strategies. In this study, a novel bone tissue engineering approach utilizing the osteoinductive properties of collagen/hydroxyapatite (HA) hydrogels and the structural support provided by 3D-printed polylactic acid (PLA) scaffolds was investigated. Specifically, MG63 osteoblast-like cells were encapsulated within collagen/HA hydrogels formulated at an optimized 5:5 ratio and subsequently loaded into PLA lattices. Cell viability, osteogenic differentiation, and mineralization, assessed through live/dead assays, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, osteogenic gene expression analysis, alizarin red S (ARS) staining, field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analyses were conducted in vitro. The results demonstrated that the 5:5 collagen/HA hydrogel supported significantly enhanced cell proliferation compared to other tested ratios and the collagen control group. Under bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2)-induced osteogenic conditions, the composite hydrogel exhibited markedly higher ALP activity and upregulated key osteogenic markers, including ALP and Osterix, indicating robust early differentiation. ARS staining and FE-SEM imaging revealed accelerated and more uniform mineral deposition in the collagen/HA group. These findings were corroborated by 3D micro-CT analysis, which showed near-complete mineralization of the scaffold interior by Day 30. These findings suggest that integrating HA into collagen hydrogels improves the biological environment for osteoblast proliferation and differentiation while promoting nucleation and mineralized extracellular matrix growth. The innovative strategy of encapsulating cells within the hydrogel before scaffold loading maximizes direct cell-material interactions, thereby facilitating more efficient osteogenic signaling compared to traditional composite scaffold fabrication methods. This composite scaffold design demonstrates strong potential for accelerating bone regeneration and improving clinical outcomes in bone defect repair.
Keywords: bone scaffold; collagen: Hydroxyapatite; osteogenic differentiation.
© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Similar articles
-
Mineralized osteoblast-derived exosomes and 3D-printed ceramic-based scaffolds for enhanced bone healing: A preclinical exploration.Acta Biomater. 2025 Jun 15;200:686-702. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2025.05.051. Epub 2025 May 21. Acta Biomater. 2025. PMID: 40409510
-
A Hydrogel Scaffold Incorporating Fennel Seed Extract Induces Osteogenic Differentiation in Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Vet Med Sci. 2025 Jul;11(4):e70460. doi: 10.1002/vms3.70460. Vet Med Sci. 2025. PMID: 40638525 Free PMC article.
-
Divergent effects of premineralization and prevascularization on osteogenesis and vascular integration in humanized tissue engineered bone constructs.Acta Biomater. 2025 Jul 1;201:665-683. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2025.06.019. Epub 2025 Jun 11. Acta Biomater. 2025. PMID: 40514004
-
Parathyroid Hormone-Related Protein-Loaded Organic and Inorganic Hybrid Aerogel Bone Scaffolds Regulate Bone Regeneration by Balancing Osteogenesis and Osteoclastogenesis.ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2025 Jun 25;17(25):36400-36419. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5c04939. Epub 2025 Jun 10. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2025. PMID: 40492745
-
Osteochondral Regeneration With Anatomical Scaffold 3D-Printing-Design Considerations for Interface Integration.J Biomed Mater Res A. 2025 Jan;113(1):e37804. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.37804. Epub 2024 Oct 10. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2025. PMID: 39387548 Review.
References
-
- T. A. St John, A. R. Vaccaro, A. P. Sah, et al., “Physical and Monetary Costs Associated With Autogenous Bone Graft Harvesting,” American Journal of Orthopedics 32, no. 1 (2003): 18–23, https://doi.org/10.1097/00000441‐200301000‐00005.
-
- C. F. Lord, M. C. Gebhardt, W. W. Tomford, and H. J. Mankin, “Infection in Bone Allografts: Incidence, Nature, and Treatment,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 70, no. 3 (1988): 369–376, https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623‐198870030‐00008.
-
- N. Xue, X. Ding, R. Huang, et al., “Bone Tissue Engineering in the Treatment of Bone Defects,” Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 15, no. 7 (2022): 879, https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15070879.
-
- A. Grémare, V. Guduric, R. Bareille, et al., “Characterization of Printed PLA Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A 106, no. 4 (2018): 887–894, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36289.
-
- A. Haider, S. Haider, S. S. Han, and I. K. Kang, “Recent Advances in the Synthesis, Functionalization, and Biomedical Applications of Hydroxyapatite: A Review,” RSC Advances 7 (2017): 7442–7458, https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA26124H.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- RS-2024-00423107, RS-2022-NR067329, and 2020R1A5A8018367/National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
- 20250527000003426624/Ministry of Education (MOE) and the Gwangju Metropolitan Government
- Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry (IPET) through the Agriculture and Food Convergence Technologies Program for Research Manpower development
- RS-2024-00397026/Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA)
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources