Associations of Skin Biomechanical Properties With Biological Aging Clocks and Longitudinal Changes in Intrinsic Capacity in Adults Aged 20-93: The INSPIRE-T Project
- PMID: 40785275
- DOI: 10.1111/acel.70190
Associations of Skin Biomechanical Properties With Biological Aging Clocks and Longitudinal Changes in Intrinsic Capacity in Adults Aged 20-93: The INSPIRE-T Project
Abstract
Evidence connecting skin aging to functional decline and systemic aging biomarkers is lacking. This study investigated how skin-aging biomechanics were associated with changes in intrinsic capacity (IC), a marker of healthy aging. We also explored their links with biological aging clocks (epigenetic and inflammatory clocks) and potential moderating effects on the skin-IC relationship. Baseline skin elasticity and viscoelasticity were measured in 441 INSPIRE-T participants aged 20 to 93 (59.9% women) using Cutometer parameters. IC was evaluated over 3 years as a five-domain score covering cognition, locomotion, psychology, vitality, and sensory (a higher score indicated better). Biological aging was measured at baseline using six epigenetic clocks (Horvath pan-tissue, Horvath skin & blood, Hannum, PhenoAge, GrimAge, and DunedinPACE) and inflammatory clock (iAge). Poor skin elasticity and viscoelasticity in older adults were associated with lower baseline IC after controlling for demographic, medical, and lifestyle factors. Longitudinally, older men with a higher viscoelastic ratio (R6) experienced a faster decline in IC (a standardized coefficient [95% CI] ranged from -0.37 [-0.72, -0.03] at age 62 to -1.32 [-1.91, -0.73] at age 93). Accelerated iAge was associated with reduced skin elasticity (R2, R5, R7). Moreover, the association between parameters related to elastic recovery (R5, R7) and baseline IC became more pronounced as accelerated iAge increased. This is the first study demonstrating the association between skin-aging biomechanics and IC. Poor skin elasticity was associated with higher systemic inflammation. Therefore, skin biomechanical properties may reflect overall functional aging, with inflammation serving as a common underlying factor.
Keywords: biomarkers; biomechanical phenomena; epigenesis; healthy aging; inflammation; intrinsic capacity; skin aging.
© 2025 The Author(s). Aging Cell published by Anatomical Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
-
- Abbas, D. B., C. V. Lavin, E. J. Fahy, et al. 2022. “Standardizing Dimensionless Cutometer Parameters to Determine In Vivo Elasticity of Human Skin.” Advanced Wound Care 11: 297–310.
-
- Ahn, S., S. Kim, H. Lee, S. Moon, and I. Chang. 2007. “Correlation Between a Cutometer and Quantitative Evaluation Using Moire Topography in Age‐Related Skin Elasticity.” Skin Research and Technology 13: 280–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600‐0846.2007.00224.x.
-
- Beard, J. R., A. Officer, I. A. de Carvalho, et al. 2016. “The World Report on Ageing and Health: A Policy Framework for Healthy Ageing.” Lancet 387: 2145–2154.
-
- Bernstein, E. F., Y. Q. Chen, J. B. Kopp, et al. 1996. “Long‐Term Sun Exposure Alters the Collagen of the Papillary Dermis: Comparison of Sun‐Protected and Photoaged Skin by Northern Analysis Immunohistochemical Staining, and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy.” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 34: 209–218.
-
- Cesari, M., I. Araujo de Carvalho, J. Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan, et al. 2018. “Evidence for the Domains Supporting the Construct of Intrinsic Capacity.” Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 73: 1653–1660.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources