Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 1;15(8):6763-6775.
doi: 10.21037/qims-2025-33. Epub 2025 Jul 30.

Prognostic significance of cold pressor test myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with ischemia and nonobstructive coronary arteries

Affiliations

Prognostic significance of cold pressor test myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with ischemia and nonobstructive coronary arteries

Wenji Yu et al. Quant Imaging Med Surg. .

Abstract

Correspondence to: Cunzhi Lu, MD. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xuzhou Central Hospital, No. 199, Jiefangnan Road, Xuzhou 221009, China. Email: 13912045900@163.com; Yuetao Wang, MD. Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No. 185, Juqian Street, Changzhou 213003, China; Institute of Clinical Translation of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Soochow University, Changzhou, China. Email: yuetao-w@163.com.

Background: Ischemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) is prevalent among patients with angina, is linked to major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), and is often driven by endothelial dysfunction. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of the cold pressor test (CPT) in identifying individuals at elevated risk for MACEs among patients with INOCA.

Methods: A total of 124 INOCA inpatients were included in the retrospective cohort study. Clinical data including age, gender, BMI, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus (DM), active smoking, and symptoms were collected from medical records. A positive CPT-myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) result was considered to be the presence of a reversible perfusion defect with a summed difference score (SDS) ≥2. The patients were routinely followed-up according to standard protocol. An MACE was defined as a composite endpoint including all-cause mortality, late coronary revascularization [≥3 months following single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)-MPI], nonfatal myocardial infarction, rehospitalization due to angina, heart failure, and stroke.

Results: The number of positive CPT-MPI cases was 49 (39.5%) and that of negative CPT-MPI cases was 75 (60.5%). Compared with negative CPT-MPI, positive CPT-MPI group had a higher percentage of DM [16 (32.7%) vs. 13 (17.3%)], coronary atherosclerosis [33 (67.3%) vs. 32 (42.7%)], and ST-T segment changes on routine admission electrocardiogram (ECG) [37 (75.5%) vs. 42 (56.0%)] (all P values <0.05). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated coronary atherosclerosis as independent risk factor for positive CPT-MPI [odds ratio (OR) 2.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22-5.90; P=0.014]. The proportion of positive CPT-MPI was higher in patients with MACEs than in patients without them [6 (32.7%) vs. 16 (8%); P <0.05]. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, only positive CPT-MPI (hazard ratio 2.97, 95% CI: 1.02-8.58; P=0.04) was significantly associated with MACE occurrence.

Conclusions: Among patients with INOCA <39.5% had positive CPT, which was significantly related to MACE occurrence. In patients with positive CPT, the risk of MACE increased twofold. Coronary atherosclerosis was the independent risk factor of positive CPT. CPT-MPI offers valuable insights for risk stratification and treatment decision-making in patients with INOCA, particularly in identifying those at higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events.

Keywords: Cold pressor test (CPT); endothelium dysfunction; ischemia and nonobstructive coronary arteries (INOCA); myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://qims.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/qims-2025-33/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of patient inclusion. CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; CAG, coronary angiography; CPT, cold pressor test; INOCA, ischemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries; MPI, myocardial perfusion imaging; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A flowchart of the CPT procedure. CPT, cold pressor test; SPECT/CT, single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography; 99mTc-MIBI, Technetium-99m Methoxyisobutyl Isonitrile.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier survival curves for patients with INOCA with negative and positive CPT. CPT, cold pressor test; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular event; INOCA, ischemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Case example. A 40-year-old female was admitted to the hospital with chest tightness for half a year and a history of diabetes for 1 year. The patient was diagnosed with INOCA (no significant stenosis was observed in CAG; exercise ECG results showed ST-T changes suggestive of myocardial ischemia) and received CPT-MPI. (A) The odd rows depict CPT, while the even rows show rest for short-axis, vertical long-axis, and horizontal long-axis images, and indicated a reversible perfusion defect at the inferior wall (red arrows). (B) The patient was instructed to immerse her foot in a container of cold water (0–5 ℃) for 1.5 minutes. (C-E) The CAG images of the LAD, LCX, and RCA, respectively, demonstrating a 20–30% stenosis in the proximal-to-middle segment of the RCA (white arrow). At 1-month follow-up, the patient was readmitted for recurrent chest pain. CAG, coronary angiography; CPT-MPI, cold pressor test myocardial perfusion imaging; ECG, electrocardiogram; INOCA, ischemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries; LAD, left anterior descending; LCX, left circumflex; RCA, right coronary artery.

Similar articles

References

    1. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2020;41:407-77. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Radico F, Zimarino M, Fulgenzi F, Ricci F, Di Nicola M, Jespersen L, Chang SM, Humphries KH, Marzilli M, De Caterina R. Determinants of long-term clinical outcomes in patients with angina but without obstructive coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2018;39:2135-46. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy185 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Feenstra RGT, Boerhout CKM, Woudstra J, Vink CEM, Wittekoek ME, de Waard GA, Appelman Y, Eringa EC, Marques KMJ, de Winter RJ, Beijk MAM, van de Hoef TP, Piek JJ. Presence of Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction, Coronary Vasospasm, and Adenosine-Mediated Vasodilatory Disorders in Patients With Ischemia and Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2022;15:e012017. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schiffrin EL, Touyz RM. From bedside to bench to bedside: role of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in remodeling of resistance arteries in hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2004;287:H435-46. 10.1152/ajpheart.00262.2004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nishimiya K, Takahashi J, Oyama K, Matsumoto Y, Yasuda S, Shimokawa H. Mechanisms of Coronary Artery Spasm. Eur Cardiol 2023;18:e39. 10.15420/ecr.2022.55 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources