Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 4:17:2421-2431.
doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S530520. eCollection 2025.

Analyzing Influencing Factors of Uterine Rupture in Pregnant Women with Scarred Uterus Undergoing Repeat Delivery and Evaluating the Predictive Value of Lower Uterine Anterior Wall Thickness

Affiliations

Analyzing Influencing Factors of Uterine Rupture in Pregnant Women with Scarred Uterus Undergoing Repeat Delivery and Evaluating the Predictive Value of Lower Uterine Anterior Wall Thickness

Liying Zhang et al. Int J Womens Health. .

Abstract

Objective: To analyze influencing factors of uterine rupture in pregnant women with a scarred uterus undergoing repeat delivery and to investigate the predictive value of transabdominal ultrasound measurement of lower uterine anterior wall thickness.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 159 pregnant women with scarred uterus (March 2022-May 2024) divided into rupture group (n=48) and non-rupture group (n=111). Lower uterine anterior wall thickness was measured via transabdominal ultrasound pre-delivery. Univariate/multivariate logistic regression and ROC curves were used to identify risk factors and evaluate predictive performance.

Results: The rupture group had higher rates of advanced maternal age, prenatal BMI ≥30 kg/m², multiparity, single-layer cesarean suturing, and shorter inter-pregnancy intervals (all P<0.05). Lower uterine anterior wall thickness was significantly thinner in the rupture group (1.24±0.31 mm vs 2.19±0.52 mm, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis identified thinner lower uterine anterior wall thickness (OR=2.359, 95% CI:1.362-4.134) and single-layer suturing (OR=1.863, 95% CI:1.125-3.086) as independent risk factors, while longer inter-pregnancy interval was protective (OR=0.256, 95% CI:0.091-0.634; all P<0.05). ROC analysis showed AUCs of 0.821 (scar thickness), 0.783 (single-layer suturing), and 0.759 (inter-pregnancy interval); combined prediction achieved an AUC of 0.894 (95% CI:0.837-0.946), sensitivity 90.23%, specificity 84.15%. Uterine rupture was associated with worse perioperative outcomes (eg, higher transfusion rates, longer hospitalization) and adverse neonatal outcomes (lower birth weight, more preterm births; all P<0.05).

Conclusion: Lower uterine anterior wall thickness, single-layer suturing, and inter-pregnancy interval are key determinants of uterine rupture. Combined assessment of these factors provides high predictive accuracy (AUC=0.894) and improves risk stratification.

Keywords: lower uterine anterior wall thickness; predictive value; risk factors; scarred uterus; uterine rupture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ROC Curve for Predicting Uterine Rupture in Pregnant Women with a Scarred Uterus Undergoing Repeat Delivery Based on Lower Uterine Anterior Wall Thickness Alone and in Combination with Other Factors.

Similar articles

References

    1. Zhang H, Wu KQ, Luo PX, et al. [Retrospective analysis of associated factors and adverse pregnancy outcomes of postpartum hemorrhage in the caesarean section of different types of placenta previa]. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023;57(2):215–221. Wolof. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20220309-00219 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang C, Wei Y, Liang HM, et al. [Clinical risk factors of cesarean scar pregnancies]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022;102(32):2495–2499. Danish. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20211208-02735 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen DJ, Du LL, Zhang LZ. [Actively deal with the current challenges of pregnancy with scar uterus]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2023;58(1):22–25. Tonga. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20221205-00739 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adu-Bredu T, Aryananda RA, Mathewlynn S, et al. Exploring pathophysiological insights to improve diagnostic utility of ultrasound markers for distinguishing placenta accreta spectrum from uterine-scar dehiscence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025;65(1):85–93. doi: 10.1002/uog.29144 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fan Y, Qin H, Ma L, et al. Predictive value of miR-192-5p for complications after caesarean section with scarred uterus. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2024;266:11–18. doi: 10.1620/tjem.2024.J090 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources