Analyzing Influencing Factors of Uterine Rupture in Pregnant Women with Scarred Uterus Undergoing Repeat Delivery and Evaluating the Predictive Value of Lower Uterine Anterior Wall Thickness
- PMID: 40787585
- PMCID: PMC12333656
- DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S530520
Analyzing Influencing Factors of Uterine Rupture in Pregnant Women with Scarred Uterus Undergoing Repeat Delivery and Evaluating the Predictive Value of Lower Uterine Anterior Wall Thickness
Abstract
Objective: To analyze influencing factors of uterine rupture in pregnant women with a scarred uterus undergoing repeat delivery and to investigate the predictive value of transabdominal ultrasound measurement of lower uterine anterior wall thickness.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of 159 pregnant women with scarred uterus (March 2022-May 2024) divided into rupture group (n=48) and non-rupture group (n=111). Lower uterine anterior wall thickness was measured via transabdominal ultrasound pre-delivery. Univariate/multivariate logistic regression and ROC curves were used to identify risk factors and evaluate predictive performance.
Results: The rupture group had higher rates of advanced maternal age, prenatal BMI ≥30 kg/m², multiparity, single-layer cesarean suturing, and shorter inter-pregnancy intervals (all P<0.05). Lower uterine anterior wall thickness was significantly thinner in the rupture group (1.24±0.31 mm vs 2.19±0.52 mm, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis identified thinner lower uterine anterior wall thickness (OR=2.359, 95% CI:1.362-4.134) and single-layer suturing (OR=1.863, 95% CI:1.125-3.086) as independent risk factors, while longer inter-pregnancy interval was protective (OR=0.256, 95% CI:0.091-0.634; all P<0.05). ROC analysis showed AUCs of 0.821 (scar thickness), 0.783 (single-layer suturing), and 0.759 (inter-pregnancy interval); combined prediction achieved an AUC of 0.894 (95% CI:0.837-0.946), sensitivity 90.23%, specificity 84.15%. Uterine rupture was associated with worse perioperative outcomes (eg, higher transfusion rates, longer hospitalization) and adverse neonatal outcomes (lower birth weight, more preterm births; all P<0.05).
Conclusion: Lower uterine anterior wall thickness, single-layer suturing, and inter-pregnancy interval are key determinants of uterine rupture. Combined assessment of these factors provides high predictive accuracy (AUC=0.894) and improves risk stratification.
Keywords: lower uterine anterior wall thickness; predictive value; risk factors; scarred uterus; uterine rupture.
© 2025 Zhang et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Figures
Similar articles
-
[Impact of the number of cesarean deliveries on adverse pregnancy outcomes of cesarean section in a single-center cohort study].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Jun 25;60(6):430-438. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20250121-00032. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2025. PMID: 40582966 Chinese.
-
Outcomes of uterine rupture in unscarred compared with the scarred uterus: analysis of 61 complete uterine rupture.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2025 Dec;38(1):2505084. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2025.2505084. Epub 2025 May 15. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2025. PMID: 40574551
-
Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;50(5):578-583. doi: 10.1002/uog.17401. Epub 2017 Oct 9. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28070914
-
Single- vs double-layer uterine closure of the cesarean scar in niche development: the Nicest Study.AJOG Glob Rep. 2025 Jun 4;5(2):100507. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100507. eCollection 2025 May. AJOG Glob Rep. 2025. PMID: 40529188 Free PMC article.
-
Gestational weight gain below instead of within the guidelines per class of maternal obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Sep;4(5):100682. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100682. Epub 2022 Jun 18. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022. PMID: 35728780
References
-
- Zhang H, Wu KQ, Luo PX, et al. [Retrospective analysis of associated factors and adverse pregnancy outcomes of postpartum hemorrhage in the caesarean section of different types of placenta previa]. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023;57(2):215–221. Wolof. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20220309-00219 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Adu-Bredu T, Aryananda RA, Mathewlynn S, et al. Exploring pathophysiological insights to improve diagnostic utility of ultrasound markers for distinguishing placenta accreta spectrum from uterine-scar dehiscence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025;65(1):85–93. doi: 10.1002/uog.29144 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources