Metagenomic approaches for the quantification of antibiotic resistance genes in swine wastewater treatment system: a systematic review
- PMID: 40788461
- DOI: 10.1007/s11033-025-10916-2
Metagenomic approaches for the quantification of antibiotic resistance genes in swine wastewater treatment system: a systematic review
Abstract
This systematic review aims to identify the metagenomic methodological approaches employed for the detection of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in swine wastewater treatment systems. The search terms used were metagenome AND bacteria AND ("antimicrobial resistance gene" OR resistome OR ARG) AND wastewater AND (swine OR pig), and the search was conducted across the following electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The search was limited to studies published between 2020 and 2024. Of the 220 studies retrieved, eight met the eligibility criteria for full-text analysis. The number of publications in this research area has increased in recent years, with China contributing the highest number of studies. ARGs are typically identified using bioinformatics pipelines that include steps such as quality trimming, assembly, metagenome-assembled genome (MAG) reconstruction, open reading frame (ORF) prediction, and ARG annotation. However, comparing ARGs quantification across studies remains challenging due to methodological differences and variability in quantification approaches. Therefore, this systematic review highlights the need for methodological standardization to facilitate comparison and enhance our understanding of antimicrobial resistance in swine wastewater treatment systems through metagenomic approaches.
Keywords: Bioinformatics; Methodological standardization; Microbial ecology; Resistome; Wastewater treatment.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Samreen, Ahmad I, Malak HA, Abulreesh HH (2021) Environmental antimicrobial resistance and its drivers: A potential threat to public health. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 27:101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2021.08.001 - DOI
-
- Brown K, Uwiera RRE, Kalmokoff ML, Brooks SPJ, Inglis GD (2017) Antimicrobial growth promoter use in livestock: a requirement to understand their modes of action to develop effective alternatives. Int J Antimicrob Agents 49:12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.08.006 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Zhang T, Nickerson R, Zhang W, Peng X, Shang Y, Zhou Y, Luo Q, Wen G, Cheng Z (2024) The impacts of animal agriculture on one health—Bacterial zoonosis, antimicrobial resistance, and beyond. One Health 18:100748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100748 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Brazilian Animal Protein Association (2024) Brazilian Animal Protein Association. Annual report. https://abpa-br.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/RA_2024_ABPA_ingles_avicu... . Accessed 20 March 2025
-
- Ngwabie NM, Chungong BN, Yengong FL (2018) Characterisation of pig manure for methane emission modelling in Sub-Saharan Africa. Biosyst Eng 170:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.03.009 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
