Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 11;42(9):425.
doi: 10.1007/s12032-025-02982-0.

18F-FDG PET/CT-based deep radiomic models for enhancing chemotherapy response prediction in breast cancer

Affiliations

18F-FDG PET/CT-based deep radiomic models for enhancing chemotherapy response prediction in breast cancer

Zirui Jiang et al. Med Oncol. .

Abstract

Enhancing the accuracy of tumor response predictions enables the development of tailored therapeutic strategies for patients with breast cancer. In this study, we developed deep radiomic models to enhance the prediction of chemotherapy response after the first treatment cycle. 18F-Fludeoxyglucose PET/CT imaging data and clinical record from 60 breast cancer patients were retrospectively obtained from the Cancer Imaging Archive. PET/CT scans were conducted at three distinct stages of treatment; prior to the initiation of chemotherapy (T1), following the first cycle of chemotherapy (T2), and after the full chemotherapy regimen (T3). The patient's primary gross tumor volume (GTV) was delineated on PET images using a 40% threshold of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). Radiomic features were extracted from the GTV based on the PET/CT images. In addition, a squeeze-and-excitation network (SENet) deep learning model was employed to generate additional features from the PET/CT images for combined analysis. A XGBoost machine learning model was developed and compared with the conventional machine learning algorithm [random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR) and support vector machine (SVM)]. The performance of each model was assessed using receiver operating characteristics area under the curve (ROC AUC) analysis, and prediction accuracy in a validation cohort. Model performance was evaluated through fivefold cross-validation on the entire cohort, with data splits stratified by treatment response categories to ensure balanced representation. The AUC values for the machine learning models using only radiomic features were 0.85(XGBoost), 0.76 (RF), 0.80 (LR), and 0.59 (SVM), with XGBoost showing the best performance. After incorporating additional deep learning-derived features from SENet, the AUC values increased to 0.92, 0.88, 0.90, and 0.61, respectively, demonstrating significant improvements in predictive accuracy. Predictions were based on pre-treatment (T1) and post-first-cycle (T2) imaging data, enabling early assessment of chemotherapy response after the initial treatment cycle. Integrating deep learning-derived features significantly enhanced the performance of predictive models for chemotherapy response in breast cancer patients. This study demonstrated the superior predictive capability of the XGBoost model, emphasizing its potential to optimize personalized therapeutic strategies by accurately identifying patients unlikely to respond to chemotherapy after the first treatment cycle.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Chemotherapy; PET/CT imaging; Radiomics model; Treatment response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: The imaging data employed in this study were sourced from the QIN-Breast dataset available through The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). This dataset is publicly accessible and has been de-identified in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) regulations, ensuring the protection of patient privacy. As the data are anonymized and publicly available, the study was exempt from institutional review board (IRB) approval. Nonetheless, we adhered to all relevant guidelines and regulations governing the use of such data. Informed consent: In accordance with TCIA’s data usage policies, we have cited the dataset appropriately and have not attempted to re-identify any individual participants.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The workflow of deep radiomics models
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparison of radiomics-only and combined model performance using ROC curves
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
CT radiomics features correlation matrix
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
PET T1 radiomics features correlation matrix
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
PET T2 radiomics features correlation matrix
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Decision curve analysis (XGBoost vs. logistic regression vs. random forest)

Similar articles

References

    1. Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. - PubMed
    1. Łukasiewicz S, et al. Breast cancer—epidemiology, risk factors, classification, prognostic markers, and current treatment strategies—an updated review. Cancers. 2021;13(17):4287. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fang S, et al. A real-world clinicopathological model for predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Front Oncol. 2024;14:1323226. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hadebe B, et al. The role of PET/CT in breast cancer. Diagnostics. 2023;13(4): 597. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li T, et al. Applications of FAPI PET/CT in the diagnosis and treatment of breast and the most common gynecologic malignancies: a literature review. Front Oncol. 2024;14:1358070. - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources