Melanoma GPA as a novel prognostic scoring model based on initial brain metastasis velocity
- PMID: 40790355
- PMCID: PMC12339928
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-15635-z
Melanoma GPA as a novel prognostic scoring model based on initial brain metastasis velocity
Abstract
Upon initial presentation, initial brain metastasis velocity (iBMV) is a prognostic factor for patients with brain metastases (BMs). Based on this metric, this study validated the predictive value of iBMV and introduced a Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA)-derived scale known as melanoma-GPA. We conducted a retrospective cohort study and enrolled patients diagnosed with malignant melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) between December 2010 and February 2023. We performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to identify prognostic factors affecting overall survival (OS). A novel prognostic scoring model was derived using these factors, then melanoma-GPA and GPA predictive capabilities were assessed and compared. We enrolled 111 patients with a median OS and iBMV of 11.80 months and 2.27, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that patients with iBMV ≤ 2.27 have better prognostic performance (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that iBMV (P = 0.035), Karnofsky Performance Status (P < 0.001), serum lactate dehydrogenase (P = 0.028), serum albumin (P = 0.041), and the systemic immune-inflammation index (P = 0.042) were independent predictors of OS. Subsequently, we established the melanoma-GPA. After risk stratification, the low-risk group had significantly longer survival than the high-risk group (17.7 vs. 7.9 months). In addition, over 3 years, the melanoma-GPA area under the curve (AUC) values were superior to GPA AUC values, indicating that melanoma-GPA has greater predictive accuracy. This study has shown that iBMV is a prognostic indicator in MBMs. Based on this factor, we established the Melanoma-GPA to comprehensively and objectively assess the prognosis of MBMs.
Keywords: Brain metastasis; Initial brain metastasis velocity; Malignant melanoma; Prognosis.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This is a retrospective study and which was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and International Conference on Harmonization of Good Clinical Practice Tripartite guidelines. This clinical study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Fujian Cancer Hospital Fuzhou, China (No. K2023-030-01). Due to the retrospective nature of the study, Institutional Review Board waived the need of obtaining informed consent. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures




References
-
- Chukwueke, U. N. & Brastianos, P. K. Precision medical approaches to the diagnoses and management of brain metastases. Curr. Treat. Opt. Oncol. 20 (6), 49. 10.1007/s11864-019-0649-y (2019). - PubMed
-
- Farris, M. et al. Brain metastasis velocity: A novel prognostic metric predictive of overall survival and freedom from Whole-Brain radiation therapy after distant brain failure following upfront radiosurgery alone. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 98 (1), 131–141. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.01.201 (2017). - PubMed
-
- McTyre, E. R. et al. Multi-institutional validation of brain metastasis velocity, a recently defined predictor of outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery. Radiother. Oncol.. 142, 168–174. 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.08.011 (2020). - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- 2024J08272/Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province
- 2020Y2012/Fujian Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy
- 2020Y2012/Fujian Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy
- 2020Y2012/Fujian Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy
- 2020Y2012/Fujian Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical