Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 11;25(1):1305.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14716-6.

Lung cancer screening experiences among patients with a smoking history and primary care providers: a qualitative study

Affiliations

Lung cancer screening experiences among patients with a smoking history and primary care providers: a qualitative study

Sandra J Japuntich et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low dose CT can identify early-stage lung cancer and reduce lung cancer mortality. LCS is underutilized. Patient and provider concerns and experiences may contribute to low utilization.

Objective: To categorize patient and provider experiences with lung cancer screening to identify barriers to utilization.

Design: Mixed methods study with a survey plus a qualitative interview.

Participants: Participants were 50 patients aged 55-80 with a smoking history and 7 primary care physicians in the United States.

Methods: Participants were interviewed about LCS perceptions and experiences. Transcripts were double-coded and an Applied Thematic Analysis identified key themes.

Results: Thirty-two patients (68% of those with valid data) met US Preventive Services Taskforce guideline criteria for lung cancer screening, 11 (22%) self-reported tests consistent with LCS. Five main themes emerged: (1) Patient knowledge about LCS is low, even among those screened. Provider knowledge is high. (2) Low dose CT for LCS is well tolerated by patients and acceptable to providers. (3) Provider behavior is influenced by public health guidelines but not insurance coverage. (4) Shared decision-making is not always engaged in. (5) System barriers in the referral process affect LCS receipt despite patient interest in LCS.

Conclusions: LCS is well tolerated by patients and valued by providers. To increase LCS knowledge and uptake, systems changes are needed to facilitate shared decision-making conversations, simplify the referral process, and provide care navigation to increase patient logistical barriers to uptake.

Keywords: Decision making, shared; Early detection of cancer; Health knowledge, attitudes, practice; Healthcare disparities; Lung neoplasms; Primary health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics and approval and consent to participate: The study procedures received approval from the institutional review boards at both Lifespan and Hennepin Healthcare (#19-4677). A waiver of documentation of informed consent was obtained from both institutional review boards. All participants received a fact sheet containing all the elements of informed consent and oral consent was obtained prior to the interviews. Consent for publication: N/A. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Leiter A, Veluswamy RR, Wisnivesky JP. The global burden of lung cancer: current status and future trends. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2023;20(9):624–39. 10.1038/s41571-023-00798-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ebell MH, Bentivegna M, Hulme C, Cancer-Specific Mortality A-C. Mortality, and overdiagnosis in lung Cancer screening trials: A Meta-Analysis. Ann Fam Med. 2020;18(6):545–52. 10.1370/afm.2582. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fedewa SA, Kazerooni EA, Studts JL, et al. State variation in Low-Dose computed tomography scanning for lung Cancer screening in the united States. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021;113(8):1044–52. 10.1093/jnci/djaa170. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Narayan AK, Gupta Y, Little BP, Shepard JO, Flores EJ. Lung cancer screening eligibility and use with low-dose computed tomography: results from the 2018 behavioral risk factor surveillance system cross‐sectional survey. Cancer. 2021;127(5):748–56. 10.1002/cncr.33322. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Poon C, Wilsdon T, Sarwar I, Roediger A, Yuan M. Why is the screening rate in lung cancer still low? A seven-country analysis of the factors affecting adoption. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1264342. 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1264342. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms