No Evidence of Metabolomic Disruptions From Real-World Intakes of Aspartame or Saccharin: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study
- PMID: 40791081
- PMCID: PMC12340425
- DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.70138
No Evidence of Metabolomic Disruptions From Real-World Intakes of Aspartame or Saccharin: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study
Abstract
Background: Artificial sweeteners have become ubiquitous additives in the food supply, and yet the safety of their regular consumption remains controversial. The present study examined whether intakes of aspartame or saccharin are related to aberrations in the plasma metabolome indicating disruptions in metabolism.
Methods: A cohort of 2160 male and female participants, mean age 32.1 years, was included in the analysis. Liquid chromatography and mass-spectrometry assessed 549 unique plasma metabolites. Diet was assessed using a validated questionnaire that allowed for estimation of aspartame and saccharin intakes. A generalized linear regression model evaluated associations of saccharin or aspartame intake with plasma metabolites with adjustment for potential confounders and multiple comparisons. Multiple sensitivity analyses and propensity score matching were conducted.
Results: Heavy aspartame intake (≥ 5 servings/day) was associated with plasma levels (per SD) of saccharin (β = 0.90; q = 9.0E-36), myo-inositol (β = 0.27; q = 3.7E-04), caffeine (β = 0.31; q = 4.1E-04), and five metabolites of caffeine including 1,7-dimethyluric acid (β = 0.37; q = 7.1E-06), 1-methylurate (β = 0.36; q = 7.1E-06), 5-acetylamino-6-amino-3-methyluracil (β = 0.38; q = 3.2E-6), theophylline (β = 0.36; q = 9.1E-06), and 1-methylxanthine (β = 0.32; q = 2.0E-03). Saccharin intake was associated with plasma levels of saccharin alone (β = 0.29; q = 1.8E-10). No associations with sugars, carbohydrates, lipids, amino acids, or other metabolites that would suggest metabolic perturbations were observed with either artificial sweetener; sensitivity analyses supported these findings.
Conclusions: In the largest metabolomics study to date, no link was found between metabolic disruptions and either aspartame or saccharin intake. We cannot exclude the possibility that more extreme intakes may be related to metabolic disruptions among consumers of artificial sweeteners.
Keywords: artificial sweeteners; aspartame; diet; metabolomics; saccharin.
© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Diabetes published by Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
V. Murthy owns stock in General Electric, Cardinal Health, Viatris, Pfizer, Amgen, Merck, and Johnson & Johnson and stock options in Ionetix. He is a paid consultant for INVIA Medical Imaging Solutions & Siemens Healthineers. V. Murthy has received research support through his institution from Siemens Healthineers. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures


References
-
- Riess L. E., Huynh B. Q., and Nachman K. E., “Aspartame Exposures in the US Population: Demonstration of a Novel Approach for Exposure Estimates to Food Additives Using NHANES Data,” Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology 35, no. 3 (2024): 351–361, 10.1038/s41370-024-00678-7. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Santos N. C., de Araujo L. M., De Luca Canto G., Guerra E. N. S., Coelho M. S., and Borin M. F., “Metabolic Effects of Aspartame in Adulthood: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials,” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 58, no. 12 (2018): 2068–2081, 10.1080/10408398.2017.1304358. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Steffen B. T., Jacobs D. R., Yi S. Y., et al., “Long‐Term Aspartame and Saccharin Intakes Are Related to Greater Volumes of Visceral, Intermuscular, and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue: The CARDIA Study,” International Journal of Obesity 47, no. 10 (2023): 939–947, 10.1038/s41366-023-01336-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Azad M. B., Abou‐Setta A. M., Chauhan B. F., et al., “Nonnutritive Sweeteners and Cardiometabolic Health: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Cohort Studies,” CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal 189, no. 28 (2017): E929–E939, 10.1503/cmaj.161390. - DOI - PMC - PubMed