Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 28:16:1609408.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1609408. eCollection 2025.

Antipsychotic medication for behaviors that challenge in individuals with intellectual disabilities: a clinically informed review

Affiliations

Antipsychotic medication for behaviors that challenge in individuals with intellectual disabilities: a clinically informed review

Alessandro Pascucci et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) frequently exhibit behaviors that challenge (BC), such as aggression and self-injury, which significantly impact their quality of life. Pharmacological interventions, particularly antipsychotics, are regularly employed to manage these behaviors. However, these medications are frequently prescribed off-label, increasing the risks of polypharmacy, drug-drug interactions, and potential adverse effects. We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify studies on antipsychotic interventions for BC in individuals with ID. Eligible studies included observational (cross-sectional and longitudinal) studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Findings from RCTs were mixed: while some trials reported reductions in aggression and irritability with antipsychotics such as risperidone and olanzapine, others showed no advantage over placebo or supported deprescription strategies. Observational studies generally supported the short-term effectiveness of risperidone, olanzapine, and zuclopenthixol in reducing aggressive behaviors, although evidence for their impact on self-injurious behaviors (SIBs) was inconsistent. Across both study types, the use of antipsychotics was consistently associated with adverse effects, including sedation, weight gain, and metabolic changes. Preliminary open-label evidence suggested that aripiprazole may reduce BC in individuals with Fragile X Syndrome (FXS), while causing fewer metabolic side effects. These findings highlight key limitations of the current literature, including the scarcity of studies focusing specifically on ID populations, small sample sizes, the limited number of RCTs, and often controversial or inconsistent results. Despite these limitations, the review indicates potential benefits from reducing dosages and discontinuing long-term antipsychotic use, particularly when guided by personalized treatment plans and regular reassessment. Overall, the results support cautious and individualized prescribing, with close monitoring of adverse effects and attention to deprescribing when appropriate. Further longitudinal and naturalistic studies are warranted, along with the development of structured tools to assist clinicians in optimizing pharmacological care for this vulnerable population.

Keywords: antipsychotics; aripiprazole; challenging behaviors; intellectual disabilities; olanzapine; pharmacological interventions; risperidone; zuclopenthixol.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Efficacy of antipsychotics on specific symptoms and support for deprescribing.

References

    1. Maulik PK, Mascarenhas MN, Mathers CD, Dua T, Saxena S. Prevalence of intellectual disability: a meta-analysis of population-based studies. Res Dev Disabil. (2011) 32:419–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.018, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee K, Cascella M, Marwaha R. Intellectual disability. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL: (2024). Available online at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547654/. - PubMed
    1. Schofield D, Shrestha R, Tan O, Lim K, Rajkumar R, West S, et al. The healthcare and societal costs of familial intellectual disability. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2024) 21:299. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030299, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ali A, Blickwedel J, Hassiotis A. Interventions for challenging behavior in intellectual disability. Adv Psychiatr Treat. (2014) 20:184–92. doi: 10.1192/apt.bp.113.011577 - DOI
    1. Ramerman L, de Kuijper G, Scheers T, Vink M, Vrijmoeth P, Hoekstra PJ. Is risperidone effective in reducing challenging behaviors in individuals with intellectual disabilities after 1 year or longer use? A placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind discontinuation study. J Intellect Disabil Res. (2019) 63:418–28. doi: 10.1111/jir.12584, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources