Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jul 28:10:28.
doi: 10.21037/aoj-25-13. eCollection 2025.

Rotator cuff repair augmentation: a review of current techniques

Affiliations
Review

Rotator cuff repair augmentation: a review of current techniques

Doria L Weiss et al. Ann Jt. .

Abstract

Rotator cuff tears are one of the most common orthopedic injuries, affecting nearly 40% of individuals over 60 years old. Surgical repair remains the gold standard following failed conservative treatment; however, retear rates remain a significant challenge, with some studies reporting recurrence in 40% to 94% of patients. In response to these high failure rates, various surgical augmentation techniques have been developed, offering the potential to enhance healing, improve repair integrity, and optimize long-term outcomes. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to assess the current methods of augmentation for rotator cuff repair (RCR) and to provide an updated analysis of augmentation techniques for RCR from 2010 to 2025. The review includes detailed descriptions of each augmentation technique, along with associated outcomes and available evidence supporting their use in clinical practice. Augmentation techniques for RCR have advanced, showing promising improvements in patient outcomes. This review highlights the growing popularity of dermal allografts and bioinductive collagen implants, alongside the emerging use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), bone marrow aspirate concentration (BMAC) and fibrin clots. While these methods demonstrate potential, further high-quality randomized, prospective studies are needed to standardize protocols, establish clear indications, and address the variability in current evidence. Key areas requiring further investigation include the long-term durability of augmented repairs, optimal patient selection criteria, the comparative efficacy of different augmentation materials, and the cost-effectiveness of these techniques in routine clinical practice.

Keywords: Rotator cuff tear; augmentation techniques; outcome; rotator cuff repair (RCR).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://aoj.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/aoj-25-13/coif). The series “Current Concepts and Techniques in Soft Tissue Repair and Joint Preservation” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. C.M.C. has received a grant from Arthrex and hospitality payments from Stryker Corp and Encore Medical. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Lawrence RL, Moutzouros V, Bey MJ. Asymptomatic Rotator Cuff Tears. JBJS Rev 2019;7:e9. 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.18.00149 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chalmers PN, Tashjian RZ. Patch Augmentation in Rotator Cuff Repair. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2020;13:561-71. 10.1007/s12178-020-09658-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jost B, Zumstein M, Pfirrmann CW, et al. Long-term outcome after structural failure of rotator cuff repairs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:472-9. 10.2106/JBJS.E.00003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mandaleson A. Re-tears after rotator cuff repair: Current concepts review. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2021;19:168-74. 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.05.019 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Park JY, Lee JH, Oh KS, et al. Rotator cuff retear after repair surgery: comparison between experienced and inexperienced surgeons. Clin Shoulder Elb 2021;24:135-40. 10.5397/cise.2021.00073 - DOI - PMC - PubMed