Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Sep;11(5):e70546.
doi: 10.1002/vms3.70546.

Giardia duodenalis in Rodents: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Giardia duodenalis in Rodents: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Tahereh Davoodi et al. Vet Med Sci. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Giardia duodenalis (also known as G. lamblia or G. intestinalis) is a globally distributed protozoan with zoonotic potential. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the global molecular prevalence and genotypic distribution of G. duodenalis in rodents, based exclusively on studies using molecular diagnostic techniques.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search up to 15 October 2024, identified 23 eligible studies encompassing 54 datasets and 5971 rodent samples from 10 countries across three continents. Prevalence estimates were pooled using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed via the I2 statistic. Assemblage and sub-assemblage distributions were analysed across rodent species and geographic regions.

Results: The pooled molecular prevalence of G. duodenalis in rodents was 7.4% (95% CI: 4.8-11.4%), with chinchillas (36.9%) and porcupines (23.1%) showing the highest infection rates. Rodents were found to harbour six assemblages (A-E, G) and four sub-assemblages (AI, AII, BIII, BIV) of G. duodenalis, with marked geographic variation. The highest pooled prevalence was observed in Europe (17.9%; 95% CI: 9.8-30.5), where assemblages C, D, G, and most occurrences of E, B, and A were reported. Assemblages C and D were entirely absent in Asia. In contrast, most reports of the rodent-specific assemblage G originated from Asia. South America (represented solely by Brazil) reported only assemblage A. China contributed the largest dataset (n = 25) and sample size (n = 4009), exhibiting high genetic diversity (A, B, E, G). Belgium also showed notable diversity (A, B, C, E), with assemblage B being the most prevalent in both countries. Assemblage D was found exclusively in Romania, while assemblage C was reported only in Belgium and Italy. Notably, the highest assemblage diversity was observed in chinchillas (five: A-E), squirrels (four: A, B, E, G), and rats (three: A, B, G).

Conclusions: Although various rodent species, especially chinchillas, mice, porcupines, rats, squirrels, and voles, carry G. duodenalis zoonotic assemblages (A and B), the overall molecular prevalence in rodents remains relatively low. Due to significant limitations in sampling design, methodological heterogeneity, limited ecological data, and unknown host health status, current evidence is insufficient to confirm rodents as major zoonotic reservoirs. Standardised, large-scale molecular studies are needed to clarify the epidemiological role of rodents in G. duodenalis transmission.

Keywords: Giardia duodenalis; assemblage; meta‐analysis; molecular prevalence; rodents; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flowchart depicting the process of included studies in the present systematic review.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Pooled molecular prevalence of G. duodenalis in rodents, with 95% confidence intervals, estimated using a random‐effects model based on included molecular studies.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Sensitivity analysis of G. duodenalis molecular prevalence in rodents.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Pooled molecular prevalence of G. duodenalis in rodents across continents, with 95% confidence intervals, estimated using a random‐effects model.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Pooled molecular prevalence of G. duodenalis in rodents by species, with 95% confidence intervals, estimated using a random‐effects model.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Assemblage distribution of G. duodenalis in rodents by continents. The numbers in the circle centres represent the total count of each assemblage isolated from rodents, while the percentages around the circles indicate the prevalence rate of each assemblage per continent.

Similar articles

References

    1. Adam, R. D. 2001. “Biology of Giardia Lamblia .” Clinical Microbiology Reviews 14, no. 3: 447–475. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adell‐Aledón, M. , Köster P. C., de L. A., et al. 2018. “Occurrence and Molecular Epidemiology of Giardia duodenalis Infection in Dog Populations in Eastern Spain.” BMC Veterinary Research 14: 1–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Argüello‐García, R. , and Ortega‐Pierres M. G.. 2021. “ Giardia Duodenalis Virulence—“to be, or Not to be.”.” Current Tropical Medical Reports 8, no. 4: 246–256. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Asghari, A. , Ebrahimi M., Shamsi L., Sadrebazzaz A., and Shams M.. 2023. “Global Molecular Prevalence of Giardia Duodenalis in Pigs (Sus domesticus): A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis.” Heliyon 9, no. 2: e13243. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Asghari, A. , Motazedian M. H., Asgari Q., et al. 2022. “Occurrence, Genetic Characterization, and Zoonotic Importance of Giardia duodenalis in Various Species of Rodents (Mus musculus, Rattus norvegicus, and Rattus rattus).” Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 85: 101812. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources