Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2025 Sep;45(9):e70264.
doi: 10.1111/liv.70264.

Breaking Barriers for Intensive Care Admission in Patients With Advanced HCC on Immunotherapy

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Breaking Barriers for Intensive Care Admission in Patients With Advanced HCC on Immunotherapy

Marta Fortuny et al. Liver Int. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Background and aims: Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission is usually denied to patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) due to the perceived poor prognosis associated with both cirrhosis and liver cancer. However, immunotherapy based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has transformed the treatment landscape, and the role of critical care is becoming more relevant in managing adverse events. We aim to assess the outcome of patients with advanced HCC treated with ICI admitted to the ICU.

Methods: We evaluated patients treated with ICI combinations across 20 medical centres globally between November 2012 and April 2024. Demographic data, ICI types, causes of admission, organ support, and mortality in the short and medium term were recorded.

Results: Of 1065 patients, 47 (4.4%) were admitted to the ICU. Most were male (76.6%) with cirrhosis (93.6%), and 59.7% received ICI as first-line therapy. The primary reasons for ICU admission were immune-related adverse events (irAE) in 46.8% and variceal bleeding in 29.8%. The median time to ICU admission was 115 days [IQR 38-202] after the initiation of ICI treatment. Among patients admitted due to irAEs, the median time was 51 days [IQR 31-137]. ICU mortality was 25.5%. Two-thirds were alive 28 days post-ICU discharge, with 3- and 6-month survival rates of 83% and 69%. Of the 61.3% of survivors, they were rechallenged with ICI or started new HCC therapy.

Conclusions: irAEs are the main cause of ICU admission in patients with advanced HCC receiving ICI. Despite the severity, 66% were discharged, and nearly half resumed treatment. These findings highlight the vital role of ICU care in managing HCC patients, challenging the notion of denying them intensive care.

Keywords: adverse events; hepatocellular carcinoma; immunotherapy; intensive care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M.F. Speaker fee: AstraZeneca. L.G.d.F. Research grant: Bayer; Advisory board: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Roche; Speaker fee: Roche, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Sirtex, MSD, BMS. M.A. Roche, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Gilead. R.S. None. J.‐C.N. Research grants from Ipsen and Bayer. M.I. Speaker Bureau and Advisory Board: Roche, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Roche Diagnostics, Gilead, MSD, EISAI, IPSEN. S.R. None. S.P. Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Roche; Speaker Fee: Roche, AstraZeneca, Eisai; Travel Grant: AbbVie, Gilead, Roche. R.J. None. M.C. Advisory Board: Roche, Eisai, MSD, AstraZeneca; Travel grant: Roche. R.R. Sponsored Lectures (National): Advanz Farm. Other COI: Conference attendance and educational activities: Gilead, Abbie, Roche, Advanz. M.S.‐Z. Speaker fees: Bayer; Travel grants: Bayer, BTG, MSD‐Eisai, and Roche. N.J.‐E. None. S.M. None. M.I. None. J.A. Speaker: Pfizer, AZ, Roche, Travel grants: Roche, AZ, Research Grants: Roche. T.H. Speaker fee: Eisai, AstraZeneca; Travel Grant: Roche. J.E.L.‐B. Medical training (consultant): Roche, BMS, Servier, Pfizer, Sanofi, Janssen, Ipsen, Merck, Amgen, Travel grants for conferences: Roche, Ipsen, BMS, Pfizer, Servier, Sanofi, Merck, Amgen. M.T.F. Speaker fee: Eisai, Roche; Gilead; Travel Grants: Eisai, Roche, Astrazeneca, Boston Scientific, Gilead. S.C. Travel expenses and congress registrations Roche. A.L. Travel and educational support from Ipsen, Pfizer, Bayer, AAA, SirtEx, Novartis, Mylan, Delcath Advanz Pharma and Roche; Speaker honoraria from Merck, Pfizer, Ipsen, Incyte, AAA/Novartis, QED, Servier, Astra Zeneca, EISAI, Roche, Advanz Pharma and MSD; Advisory and consultancy honoraria from EISAI, Nutricia, Ipsen, QED, Roche, Servier, Boston Scientific, Albireo Pharma, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GENFIT, TransThera Biosciences, Taiho and MSD; Principal Investigator‐associated Institutional Funding form QED, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, Servier, Astra Zeneca, GenFit, Panbela Therapeutics, Novocure GmbH, Camurus AB, Albireo Pharma, Taiho, TransThera, Jazz Therapeutics and Roche; Member of the Knowledge Network and NETConnect Initiatives funded by Ipsen. J.I.M. Speaker Fee: Roche, Astra Zeneca, Knight, Bayer, Gilead. E.R. none. A.M.L. Speaking fee: Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bristol‐Myers, Eisai, MSD, Roche, Servier. Advisory Board: Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Eisai, Roche. A.L. Speaker in educational activities supported by industries (Eisai, Astellas Pharma S.A., Roche Farma, Advanz Pharma). M.V. Lecture fees, consulting work, travel support, and congress registration: Astrazeneca, Roche, Boston. A.M. Speaker in educational activities, lecture fees, consulting work, travel support, and congress registration: Astrazeneca, Roche, Boston, EISAI, and Sirtex. J.F. None. M.R. Consultant or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eli Lilly, Geneos, Ipsen, Merck, Roche, Universal DX, Boston Scientific, Engitix Therapeutics, Parabilis Medicines Inc.; Speaking: AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Roche, Biotoscana Farma.; Travel support: Astrazeneca, Roche, Bayer, BMS, Lilly, Ipsen; Principal or sub‐Investigator of drug under development: Abbvie, BMS, Adaptimmune, Nerviano, Medivir, Bayer, Ipsen, Astrazeneca, Terumo, Incyte, Roche, Boston Scientific, Medivir; Grant Research Support (to the institution): Bayer, Ipsen; Educational Support (to the institution): Bayer, Astrazeneca, Eisai‐ Merck MSD, Roche, Ipsen, Lilly, Terumo, BMS, Next, Boston Scientific, Ciscar Medical, Eventy C3 LLC (Egypt).

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flowchart of patients admitted to the ICU based on the cause of admission and outcome at discharge. ICU, intensive care unit, irAE, immune‐related adverse event.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
(A) Kaplan–Meier survival curve at 28 days, 3, and 6 months after ICU admission in the whole cohort. (B) Kaplan–Meier survival curve at 3, and 6 months among patients alive 28 days after ICU discharge. ICU, intensive care unit; irAE, immune‐related adverse event.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Proportion of patients rechallenged/subsequent HCC treatment, no rechallenged, and death within admission or at 28 days, based on the cause of admission. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; irAE, immune‐related adverse event.

References

    1. Finn R. S., Qin S., Ikeda M., et al., “Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma,” New England Journal of Medicine 382 (2020): 1894–1905. - PubMed
    1. Abou‐Alfa G. K., Lau G., Kudo M., et al., “Tremelimumab plus Durvalumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma,” NEJM Evidence 1 (2022): EVIDoa2100070. - PubMed
    1. Qin S., Chan S. L., Gu S., et al., “Camrelizumab Plus Rivoceranib Versus Sorafenib as First‐Line Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma (CARES‐310): A Randomised, Open‐Label, International Phase 3 Study,” Lancet 402 (2023): 1133–1146. - PubMed
    1. Yau T., Galle P. R., Decaens T., et al., “Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Lenvatinib or Sorafenib as First‐Line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma (CheckMate 9DW): An Open‐Label, Randomised, Phase 3 Trial,” Lancet 405, no. 10492 (2025): 1851–1864. - PubMed
    1. Ng K. Y. Y., Wong L. W. J., Ang A. J. S., et al., “Real‐World Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Experience of a Tertiary Asian Center,” Asia‐Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology 17 (2021): e249–e261. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances