Design considerations for C9orf72 disease prevention trials
- PMID: 40794569
- PMCID: PMC12588679
- DOI: 10.1093/brain/awaf290
Design considerations for C9orf72 disease prevention trials
Abstract
The idea that it might be possible to prevent some forms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia has finally come of age. The hexanucleotide repeat expansion in the C9orf72 gene accounts for ∼10% of all amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and 10%-15% of all frontotemporal dementia diagnoses, with the two clinical syndromes co-manifesting in a significant number of patients. As a result, clinically unaffected carriers of pathogenic C9orf72 repeat expansions are currently the largest identifiable population at significantly elevated risk for both amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia, and in whom it might be possible to prevent the emergence of clinically manifest disease. Strategies for the design of disease prevention trials among clinically unaffected C9orf72 carriers have begun to emerge separately in the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia fields. However, recognition of the need to define neurodegenerative diseases based on biology underscores the need to consider all potential clinical manifestations of a C9orf72 repeat expansion together, rather than the traditional siloed approach of focusing on only amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or only frontotemporal dementia. Indeed, emerging clinical and biological markers that might be used to quantify pre-symptomatic disease progression and to predict the short-term risk of phenoconversion to clinically manifest disease are shared across the phenotypic spectrum. Given the anticipated progress in the development of therapeutic strategies to target the C9orf72 repeat expansion, and the enthusiasm for prevention trials among the unaffected C9orf72 repeat expansion carrier population, now is the time to begin work on the design of disease prevention trials. To this end, The Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration and The ALS Association supported a multi-stakeholder workshop (in Washington D.C., June 2024) to unify efforts to design a prevention trial for the population at elevated genetic risk for the phenotypic spectrum of C9orf72 disease. Here we describe recommendations emanating from this workshop for the selection of outcome measures, delineation of eligibility criteria, optimal use of biomarkers and digital health technologies, potential analytic frameworks and relevant regulatory considerations related to C9orf72 disease prevention trials. We also emphasize the importance of the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia communities working together in partnership with the C9orf72 repeat expansion carrier community, the regulatory authorities and the broader drug development community.
Keywords: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS); biomarker; frontotemporal dementia (FTD); phenoconversion; pre-symptomatic; regulatory considerations.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.
Conflict of interest statement
M.B. reports consulting fees from Alaunos, Alector, Alexion, Amgen, Annexon, Arrowhead, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Canopy, Cartesian, CorEvitas, Denali, Eli Lilly, Immunovant, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Prilenia, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB, uniQure, and Woolsey. The University of Miami has licensed intellectual property to Biogen to support design of the ATLAS study. MB is an unpaid member of the Board of Trustees of the ALS Association. A.M.S. reports consulting fees from Alector, Aviado Bio, CervoMed, Passage Bio, Prevail Therapeutics/Eli Lilly, Takeda, and Vesper Bio. The University of California, San Francisco has licensed intellectual property related to digital cognitive tests developed by A.M.S. M.Q. is an employee of Berry Consultants, LLC where he/she serves as a consultant to numerous pharmaceutical and device companies. E.A.M. reports serving on the advisory board of Annexon, BIAL Biotech, Cortexyme, Chase Therapeutics, Enterin, Hillhurst, Merck, nQ Medical, and Partner Therapeutics; serving on the steering committee of Biogen, Stoparkinson, and UCB; and being a member of the data and safety monitoring board (DSMB) of argenx, NeuroSense, Novartis, and Sanofi. J.D.B. reports consulting fees from Trace Neuroscience, Biogen, MT Pharma of America, MT Pharma Holdings of America, Janssen, Alexion, Regeneron, and Amylyx. He has received research support from Biogen, Clene Nanomedicine, MT Pharma of America, MT Pharma Holdings of America, Alexion, Amylyx, Rapa Therapeutics, Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics, ProJenX, Uniqure, MDA, ALSA, ALS Finding A Cure, ALS One, Tambourine, DoD, and NINDS. He has been a paid educational speaker for PeerView and Projects in Knowledge. C.O. reports consulting fees from Eisai, Eli Lilly, Neuvivo, AviadoBio, Otsuka and Sanofi. H.R. reports consulting fees from Eli Lilly. A.S. reports being a full-time employee of Transposon Therapeutics. B.D. reports consulting fees and travel support for his role as an advisor for Arch Venture Partners, Cerveau Technologies, Epilepsy Foundation, Loulou Foundation, and The Michael J Fox Foundation. B.D. has a leadership or fiduciary role in the Virginia Neurological Society (past president) and Prothena (Director). B.D. holds stock options with Prothena. A.B. reports consulting fees from Alector, Alexion, Arrowhead, Arvinas, Eli Lilly, Merck, Neurocrine, Oligomerix, Ono, Oscotec, Pfizer, Switch, Transposon. Equity interest in Alector, Arvinas and Neurovanda Therapeutics. Unfunded research collaborations with Denali and Janssen. Research funding from Biogen, Eisai and Regeneron paid to institution. The remaining authors report no competing interests.
Figures
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
