Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 4;29(4):321-327.
doi: 10.1188/25.CJON.321-327.

The Effects of a Clinical Care Model on Quality Process Outcomes in Radiation Oncology

Affiliations

The Effects of a Clinical Care Model on Quality Process Outcomes in Radiation Oncology

Stephen P Miller et al. Clin J Oncol Nurs. .

Abstract

Background: Nurse engagement is correlated with adequate staffing, top-of-license practice, and a primary nursing model with a nurse leader. In an academic radiation oncology practice lacking primary nursing alignment and top-of-license practice, leadership implemented a clinical care model.

Objectives: This study aimed to improve nursing engagement and quality process outcomes.

Methods: In this quality improvement study, leadership implemented a clinical care model including the establishment of a nurse leader, staffing benchmarks, and a primary nursing model, and redefined responsibilities to support top-of-license practice. The study population included 17 team members (8 physicians, 5 clinic schedulers, and 4 RNs). Surveys were distributed prior to and three months postimplementation.

Findings: Postimplementation, patient rooming by RNs decreased, documentation of side effect education increased, and all RNs reported top-of-license practice often/always. Physicians reported improvement in moderate/strong ratings for RN and clinic scheduler expertise and nursing care quality. These results suggest that enhanced clinical care models can improve quality process outcomes in radiation oncology.

Keywords: nurse engagement; nurse retention; physician engagement; radiation oncology.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. American College of Radiation Oncology. Manual for ACRO accreditation. 2023. http://bit.ly/4nT6dNc .
    1. American Society for Radiation Oncology. Safety is no accident: A framework for quality radiation oncology care. 2019. https://www.astro.org/astro/media/astro/patientcareandresearch/pdfs/safe... .
    1. American Society for Radiation Oncology. ASTRO’s APEx Accreditation Program for Excellence®: APEx® standards guide. 2024. https://www.astro.org/getmedia/d6ee884d-eb5b-4af6-85f6-c27e2aa6439e/APEx... .
    1. Blayney DW, Simon MK, Podtschaske B, Ramsey S, Shyu M, Lindquist C, Milstein A. Critical lessons from high-value oncology practices. JAMA Oncology. 2018;4(2):164–171. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3803. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brooks Carthon JM, Hatfield L, Plover C, Dierkes A, Davis L, Hedgeland T, Aiken LH. Association of nurse engagement and nurse staffing on patient safety. Journal of Nursing Care Quality. 2019;34(1):40–46. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000334. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources