Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 5:ehaf447.
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf447. Online ahead of print.

Cardiovascular benefit of continuous positive airway pressure according to high-risk obstructive sleep apnoea: a multi-trial analysis

Affiliations

Cardiovascular benefit of continuous positive airway pressure according to high-risk obstructive sleep apnoea: a multi-trial analysis

Ali Azarbarzin et al. Eur Heart J. .

Abstract

Background and aims: Randomized trials of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in patients with cardiovascular disease have not detected reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). This study tested whether the cardiovascular benefit of CPAP occurs preferentially in high-risk OSA, characterized by greater OSA-related heart rate acceleration or hypoxaemia.

Methods: In a post hoc analysis of pooled Randomized Intervention with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Coronary Artery Disease and Obstructive Sleep Apnoea, Impact of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Nonsleepy Obstructive Sleep Apnoea, and Sleep Apnoea Cardiovascular Endpoints Study randomized trials; outcomes were stratified by high-risk OSA status, defined by heart rate response following OSA respiratory events >9.4 b.p.m. (third tertile) or oxygen desaturation area under baseline (hypoxic burden) > 87.1% min/h (third tertile). Cox mixed models quantified the CPAP treatment effect on MACCE (including cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke) within high-risk OSA and the difference vs low-risk status (primary test). Secondary analyses examined participants without excessive sleepiness (Epworth <11 points) or without increased blood pressure (systolic/diastolic <140/90 mmHg).

Results: In 3549 participants, 16.6% and 16.3% reached the MACCE endpoint with CPAP (n = 1778) and usual care (n = 1771), respectively. The CPAP treatment effect was greater in participants with vs without high-risk OSA [interaction hazard ratio (iHR) .69, 95% confidence interval (CI) .50-.95, Pinteraction = .024; Nhigh-risk = 1832]. The differential effect was stronger in those without excessive sleepiness (iHR .59, 95% CI .41-.84; Nhigh-risk = 1509), or without increased blood pressure (iHR .54, 95% CI .36-.81; Nhigh-risk = 1244). Continuous positive airway pressure benefits in high-risk OSA were observed alongside harm in low-risk OSA.

Conclusions: Continuous positive airway pressure preferentially improves cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk OSA, while harm in low-risk OSA may counteract this effect. These findings provide a pathway to identify patients likely to benefit.

Keywords: Heart rate response; Hypoxic burden; MACCE; Obstructive sleep apnoea; Phenotype; Precision medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram presenting ascertainment of the study sample. CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; ISAACC, Impact of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Nonsleepy Obstructive Sleep Apnoea; RICCADSA, Randomized Intervention with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Coronary Artery Disease and Obstructive Sleep Apnoea; SAVE, Sleep Apnoea Cardiovascular Endpoints Study; SpO2, oxygen saturation
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier survival curves showing the effect of continuous positive airway pressure on major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in al-comers (A, D, G, and J), in those with high-risk (C, F, I, and L) and low-risk (B, E, H, and K) obstructive sleep apnoea in all participants (first row), in those without excessive sleepiness (Epworth sleepiness scale < 11; second row), without increased blood pressure (systolic/diastolic <140/90 mmHg; third row), and those without increased blood pressure or excessive sleepiness (bottom row). MACCE, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events

References

    1. Benjafield AV, Ayas NT, Eastwood PR, Heinzer R, Ip MSM, Morrell MJ, et al. Estimation of the global prevalence and burden of obstructive sleep apnoea: a literature-based analysis. Lancet Respir Med 2019;7:687–98. 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30198-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gottlieb DJ, Yenokyan G, Newman AB, O’Connor GT, Punjabi NM, Quan SF, et al. Prospective study of obstructive sleep apnea and incident coronary heart disease and heart failure: the sleep heart health study. Circulation 2010;122:352–60. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.901801 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Punjabi NM, Caffo BS, Goodwin JL, Gottlieb DJ, Newman AB, O’Connor GT, et al. Sleep-disordered breathing and mortality: a prospective cohort study. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000132. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000132 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Redline S, Yenokyan G, Gottlieb DJ, Shahar E, O’Connor GT, Resnick HE, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea and incident stroke: the sleep heart health study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010;182:269–77. 10.1164/rccm.200911-1746OC - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marin JM, Carrizo SJ, Vicente E, Agusti AG. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes in men with obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea with or without treatment with continuous positive airway pressure: an observational study. Lancet 2005;365:1046–53. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71141-7 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources