Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 12;26(4):835-842.
doi: 10.5811/westjem.33600.

The Effect of Pain on the Relationship Between Triage Acuity and Emergency Department Hospitalization Rate and Length of Stay

Yan-He Lin  1 , Nai-Wen Ku  2 , Chia-Hsin Ko  3 , Eric H Chou  4 , Chih-Hung Wang  3   5 , Tsung-Chien Lu  3   5 , Chien-Hua Huang  3   5 , Chu-Lin Tsai  3   5
Affiliations

The Effect of Pain on the Relationship Between Triage Acuity and Emergency Department Hospitalization Rate and Length of Stay

Yan-He Lin et al. West J Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Objectives: Little is known about the effect of pain on the relationship between triage and patient outcomes in United States emergency departments (ED). In this study we aimed to describe pain-associated ED visits and to explore how pain modifies the ability of ED triage to predict patient outcomes (hospitalization and ED length of stay [EDLOS)].

Methods: We obtained data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), 2010-2021. Adult ED visits without missing data on pain score or triage level were included. We assessed pain scores at triage using a numeric rating scale (NRS) of 0-10. We further categorized the NRS scores into no (0), mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), and severe (7-10) pain. The five-level Emergency Severity Index was used for ED triage. The primary outcomes were hospital admission during the ED visit and EDLOS. For the analyses we used descriptive statistics and multivariable regression accounting for NHAMCS's complex survey design.

Results: Over the 12-year study period, there were 132,308 adult ED visits (representing 773,000,000 ED visits nationwide). Approximately 50% were triaged to level 3, followed by 30% to level 4. Approximately 45% reported severe pain, 21% moderate pain, 9% mild pain, and 25% no pain. Triage level 1 was associated with the highest rate of hospitalization (35%), with a gradual decrease in hospitalization rate from levels 2 to 4. Triage level 2 was associated with the longest mean EDLOS (5.6 hours), with a gradual decrease in EDLOS from levels 3 to 5. When stratified by pain intensity, the pattern of hospitalization altered in the mild and moderate pain groups. In these two pain-intensity groups, triage level 1 was associated with lower-than-expected odds of hospitalization, a 31% reduction suggested by the interaction term (adjusted odds ratio 0.69; 95% confidence interval .51-.92, P = .01). By contrast, the pattern of EDLOS persisted across all pain-intensity groups.

Conclusion: Mild and moderate levels of pain intensity appear to negatively impact the ability of triage to predict hospitalization, resulting in overtriage among patients in these two pain-intensity groups. Pain intensity in the ED should be carefully evaluated to avoid overtriage and ensure the appropriate allocation of resources.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual diagram of the research question. ESI, Emergency Severity Index; ED, emergency department; LOS, length of stay.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The patient selection process. ED, emergency department.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Admission rates associated with triage levels, stratified by the pain-intensity group.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Emergency department length of stay associated with triage levels, stratified by the pain-intensity group. ED, Emergency Department.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Marco CA, Kanitz W, Jolly M. Pain scores among emergency department (ED) patients: comparison by ED diagnosis. J Emerg Med. 2013;44(1):46–52. - PubMed
    1. Davis S, Ju C, Marchandise P, et al. Impact of pain assessment on Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale prediction of patient outcomes. Ann Emerg Med. 2022;79(5):433–40. - PubMed
    1. Daoust R, Paquet J, Bailey B, et al. Vital signs are not associated with self-reported acute pain intensity in the emergency department. CJEM. 2016;18(1):19–27. - PubMed
    1. Levy N, Sturgess J, Mills P. “Pain as the fifth vital sign” and dependence on the “numerical pain scale” is being abandoned in the US: Why? Br J Anaesth. 2018;120(3):435–8. - PubMed
    1. Karcioglu O, Topacoglu H, Dikme O, et al. A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: which to use? Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(4):707–14. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources